[eco999]

Add 10 levels every year but make getting those 10 levels SUPER UBER HARD and you get a prize or something for getting to it.
You can also wear a new set of some sort if you get to that level.

[zepher2211]

k so, create a higher level cap without new stat gains, but create new cooler looking sets the higher you level, which also give no new stats; that way only those who enjoy sector + new sets will get anything out of it, not people looking for op'ness

[Pokeh]

@tricky: well 5-10 levels a year shouldn't be too much. not to mention going from one level to the next would be a pain in the ass already.

bc won't last forever, and going 5 levels a year wouldn't hit to the max level possible coding wise anytime soon lol

but balancing ya would be an issue. screw whole sets, just certain items that give slightly higher bonuses than current items (i.e e.f's, flags, etc.)

[BonzoDog]

+1 to adding higher level cap.

Reasons:
- People won't stay forever if they've got nothing to aim for
- Those that want to be the best will aim for that goal
- Some people have already earned it with their mass amounts of XP (e.g. ICE, TheMatic [ik hes gone] etc.)
- not to seem ****y or anything but for a frequent bout memberm level 200 is a walk in the park.
- Higher level = Higher HP = Higher sector levels could be made = fun fun fun
- a chance to finally add a "Max level reward scheme".
- I would enjoy this if it were insanely hard to level up, nothin like a bit a grindin
- It's been a while since I've seen the level up sign next to my name
- from what I've seen, more of the community has +1'd this thank -1. (I've only read one page but i bet there are more +1)

Just my personal opinion, if you don't agree, then feel free to say so and i'll be sure to ignore it. thanks <3

[Yz]

+1 to adding higher level cap.

Reasons:
- People won't stay forever if they've got nothing to aim for
- Those that want to be the best will aim for that goal
- Some people have already earned it with their mass amounts of XP (e.g. ICE, TheMatic [ik hes gone] etc.)
- not to seem ****y or anything but for a frequent bout memberm level 200 is a walk in the park.
- Higher level = Higher HP = Higher sector levels could be made = fun fun fun
- a chance to finally add a "Max level reward scheme".
- I would enjoy this if it were insanely hard to level up, nothin like a bit a grindin
- It's been a while since I've seen the level up sign next to my name
- from what I've seen, more of the community has +1'd this thank -1. (I've only read one page but i bet there are more +1)

Just my personal opinion, if you don't agree, then feel free to say so and i'll be sure to ignore it. thanks <3

Just read the ending so all will be sure to ignore your retarded opinion thanks <3

poke i'm not totally against the idea but y2k's points are just awful. i always go against the person making the suggestion unless they make it clear how it will benefit and what we can do for it not to fail. the idea has flaws and someone needs to figure a fix for everything :3

[Pokeh]

kenny's here 4 dat.

most problems are solved. non-members will probably be most unhappy by it because of the higher level cap difference.

eh

[Yz]

allie wouldnt go for that

now that you say you have no intention to fix anything for non members i bet you wouldn't agree with this at all if you didn't have free member from begging kenny so this topic is now cancer till it gets at least one good person backing it up

[Pokeh]

i never said nothing for the non-members just that they wouldn't like it.

raise level cap to 160 for non-members? lul

[Yz]

non-members will probably be most unhappy by it because of the higher level cap difference.

that implies nothing for non members

lv 160 will not get non members any new armor so they'd ragequit

yah no one smart backing this up so, cancer as i said

[Shadow]

I like Zepher's idea.  Increase the level cap just don't increase the stats.  Instead just added different colored armors and stuff for people to level up and get.

[Pokeh]

non-members will probably be most unhappy by it because of the higher level cap difference.

that implies nothing for non members

lv 160 will not get non members any new armor so they'd ragequit

yah no one smart backing this up so, cancer as i said

well if you like ruining everything then **** you man

[y2k]

non-members will probably be most unhappy by it because of the higher level cap difference.

that implies nothing for non members

lv 160 will not get non members any new armor so they'd ragequit

yah no one smart backing this up so, cancer as i said

Maybe non-members might be re considering buying a membership if it was a popular option in the game of bc.

[hawk5005]

Too much work.
Increasing the max level cap would mean a new armor and a new sector level. Doing that will just create a bigger difference between member and non-member. The non-member cap should also be raised up to the next armor and the next sector level, that would mean more work. And then it comes the balancing thing.
Too much work.

[NeoKiller]

Actually some of the arguments kinda convinced me.
But not completly, I'm somehow undecided.
It'd be cool to have higher lvl with higher armor but with same stats as lvl 200.
Just cooler armor. But it is also kinda alot of work and we need someone doing the new smexy armor.
Also the top ranked people would be auto max level again and the lower lvl would complain sth like that "omg thats unfair they r auto lvled to new max lvl"...

[Shadow]

They wouldn't need to create a new sector level really because no one hardly does 221.  So if they'd raise the level cap 221 would prolly get more action because people could do it a little faster and not take like 4-6 minutes lol.