[paranoia]

What if in the shop you can buy items and change the color of the gun, body, head, and etc!!! Like this:

You could add three colors to a item you would like to purchase.  
You can change the stripes on the body's color, the head's eye color,
and the arm's fist color. Now you may be saying why not make a GFX mod
that's because only you can see it. With this Idea everyone can see your design.

[Allie]

..is it too hard to call that colour green? maybe lime?

[antisickness]

too much effort m888888

[paranoia]

..is it too hard to call that colour green? maybe lime?

I got that pic off the internet. Here:
http://fillster.com/images/color-chart.png
This is specific coloring ^ In all seriousness I think its a good idea.

[lara538]

And they could make u needed to pay ingame-currency to change colors in a way that i didnt think yet. It would help to solve the gigas and/or coins problem of the game

[Cooky]

cool idea, not worth the admins time right now. If it was added it should be members only and cost a lot

also makes (E) parts obsolete 

[paranoia]

And they could make u needed to pay ingame-currency to change colors in a way that i didnt think yet. It would help to solve the gigas and/or coins problem of the game

Yes like 3,000 gigas/ 300 coins for color change.

cool idea, not worth the admins time right now. If it was added it should be members only and cost a lot

also makes (E) parts obsolete  

No, why you always trying to make everything a members item?

[Cooky]

No, why you always trying to make everything a members item?

I don't know where you're getting that idea

I just think something cosmetic would be a good members only feature

maybe (E) parts could be changed to non-members if this was added

[hawk5005]

I had a similar idea, but it involved changing the model, not the color.

[paranoia]

No, why you always trying to make everything a members item?

I don't know where you're getting that idea

I just think something cosmetic would be a good members only feature

maybe (E) parts could be changed to non-members if this was added

I know what your leading up to more benefit for the non-member players got-cha.  

[qolderman]

i love the idea

[paranoia]

i love the idea

Yeah, but probably won't get implicated because none of the stuff I suggested gets implanted. (I think a lot of people who suggested stuff never got implanted)

[123bomb123]

too much effort m888888

ur blacker than 6 zeros

 Going completely Off-Topic in Suggestions.

[Pokeh]

But a server reset (while eliminating the various sub-sets in the game) would be an even better idea.

[HyperShadic6]

I like it. There is such a thing in Vindictus and it costs a lot there. To make people use more gigas they have to get a random colour every time they want to re colour and if they get a different colour from what they wanted they need to pay extra. The normal fee should reset every 3-4 days

[xXassassinXx]

I love the idea and maybe another feature could be like you make your design like flames for example (hence my name XD) and put it on the whatever just another idea. Also I am too poor in real life to afford member and I want it how is it my fault I am poor I was born like this we should make a adjustment to the prices of zc and member but forget that. Great idea paro

[paranoia]

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

[Allie]

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

[Purple]

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

Removing stashes for non-members completely would be retarded.

The idea is alright I guess.

[Allie]

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

Removing stashes for non-members completely would be retarded.

The idea is alright I guess.

everyone uses marketplace anyway.

[Purple]

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

Removing stashes for non-members completely would be retarded.

The idea is alright I guess.

everyone uses marketplace anyway.

Then what would be the point of removing stashes? If everyone uses the marketplace anyway, there's no point in limiting stashes, it would just be a "fake" reward to members.

[Allie]

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

Removing stashes for non-members completely would be retarded.

The idea is alright I guess.

everyone uses marketplace anyway.

Then what would be the point of removing stashes? If everyone uses the marketplace anyway, there's no point in limiting stashes, it would just be a "fake" reward to members.

Convenience.

[Madprox]

Convenience.

Which is a big thing for alot of players.

[paranoia]

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

Well fine what ever makes you profit. You should consider my past ideas as well. If you would like I can offer some other "good" ideas to make purchasing membership more intriguing.

Don't remove stashes if you got so many ideas in the suggestions you never even tried to implicate in the game.

[Purple]

Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

[CyberSox]

Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

Adverts aren't convenient for the consumer, yet they are a part of most things. They are inconvenient for the non payer and better for those who pay. It's the same general concept.

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

#bringbackpurpletext

[paranoia]

Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

Adverts aren't convenient for the consumer, yet they are a part of most things. They are inconvenient for the non payer and better for those who pay. It's the same general concept.

It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

#bringbackpurpletext

Would it be better if you can chose out of 3 colors for your text? Btw the purple text thing is making people sound selfish and greedy.

[Purple]

Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

Adverts aren't convenient for the consumer, yet they are a part of most things. They are inconvenient for the non payer and better for those who pay. It's the same general concept.

It's not the same thing. Most adverts aren't inheritantly inconvenient. Some exceptions are ads that you have to wait to skip, ie. ad.fly, and pop-up ads. Even then, the ads on YouTube that you need to wait 3 seconds to skip aren't that inconvenient.

In an online game if you have to pay to get rid of inconvenient things, then it's a bad business model. If you can pay to make things MORE convenient, that's fine.

I'll use LoL as an example.

They sell experience boosts to help people level up faster. They don't make leveling inconvenient, but if you want to level up faster then you can spend a certain amount of money to shorten the amount of time that it takes to reach the level cap. It doesn't hurt the f2p user experience but can still give people a reason to be a premium member.

[paranoia]

Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

Adverts aren't convenient for the consumer, yet they are a part of most things. They are inconvenient for the non payer and better for those who pay. It's the same general concept.

It's not the same thing. Most adverts aren't inheritantly inconvenient. Some exceptions are ads that you have to wait to skip, ie. ad.fly, and pop-up ads. Even then, the ads on YouTube that you need to wait 3 seconds to skip aren't that inconvenient.

In an online game if you have to pay to get rid of inconvenient things, then it's a bad business model. If you can pay to make things MORE convenient, that's fine.

I'll use LoL as an example.

They sell experience boosts to help people level up faster. They don't make leveling inconvenient, but if you want to level up faster then you can spend a certain amount of money to shorten the amount of time that it takes to reach the level cap. It doesn't hurt the f2p user experience but can still give people a reason to be a premium member.

Referring to the advertisement , there not inconvenient as a matter of fact I don't even notice them sometimes. As long as they don't have it in-game like the old bots.

[CyberSox]

Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

Adverts aren't convenient for the consumer, yet they are a part of most things. They are inconvenient for the non payer and better for those who pay. It's the same general concept.

It's not the same thing. Most adverts aren't inheritantly inconvenient. Some exceptions are ads that you have to wait to skip, ie. ad.fly, and pop-up ads. Even then, the ads on YouTube that you need to wait 3 seconds to skip aren't that inconvenient.

In an online game if you have to pay to get rid of inconvenient things, then it's a bad business model. If you can pay to make things MORE convenient, that's fine.

I'll use LoL as an example.

They sell experience boosts to help people level up faster. They don't make leveling inconvenient, but if you want to level up faster then you can spend a certain amount of money to shorten the amount of time that it takes to reach the level cap. It doesn't hurt the f2p user experience but can still give people a reason to be a premium member.

I don't know much about LoL, but I know it has a pretty big player base and makes a looooooooot of money. You can't compare a company that size to the Zylongaming, Zylon have to make money somehow. Also, you imply that they would be adding a feature that causes inconvenience, while in reality they are just changing a feature that already exists to make member benefits more appealing. Stashes are just additional storage, easier to use than the marketplace, and don't have a real impact on the game. I see nothing wrong with slightly altering one minor option of the game to increase income and satisfaction for new members.

[Purple]

Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

Adverts aren't convenient for the consumer, yet they are a part of most things. They are inconvenient for the non payer and better for those who pay. It's the same general concept.

It's not the same thing. Most adverts aren't inheritantly inconvenient. Some exceptions are ads that you have to wait to skip, ie. ad.fly, and pop-up ads. Even then, the ads on YouTube that you need to wait 3 seconds to skip aren't that inconvenient.

In an online game if you have to pay to get rid of inconvenient things, then it's a bad business model. If you can pay to make things MORE convenient, that's fine.

I'll use LoL as an example.

They sell experience boosts to help people level up faster. They don't make leveling inconvenient, but if you want to level up faster then you can spend a certain amount of money to shorten the amount of time that it takes to reach the level cap. It doesn't hurt the f2p user experience but can still give people a reason to be a premium member.

I don't know much about LoL, but I know it has a pretty big player base and makes a looooooooot of money. You can't compare a company that size to the Zylongaming, Zylon have to make money somehow. Also, you imply that they would be adding a feature that causes inconvenience, while in reality they are just changing a feature that already exists to make member benefits more appealing. Stashes are just additional storage, easier to use than the marketplace, and don't have a real impact on the game. I see nothing wrong with slightly altering one minor option of the game to increase income and satisfaction for new members.

I'm not comparing companies, i'm comparing business models. Which I can do, regardless of how big Zylon Gaming is.

I'm not saying they're adding a feature that causes inconvenience, i'm saying they're making a change that causes inconvenience, which is a fact. It's inconvenient to go into your web browser just to store some items. Also, you're right, it doesn't have an impact on the game, but it has an impact on a f2p player's experience. Which should be one of the most important things that Zylon Gaming, or any company for that matter, thinks about.

"...to increase income and satisfaction for new members."
Sure, it increases satisfaction for new members, but it hurts the player experience by forcing them to use an external application to store items that they recieve in-game. It's a bad system that purposely makes it inconveient for f2p players, which I think most people can agree is bad. Zylon Gaming should reward people that are willing to be premium members, not damage the experience of f2p players.

Imo, if they wanna make membership more appealing, the change should also benefit current members, rather than just new members. Add to the experience of premium players, don't subtract from the experience of f2p players.

[paranoia]

@purple
Yet, again there are various limitations considering they couldn't add any models into the game if I'm not mistaken.
To implicate some news features must be impracticable. Making members benifits supreme is hard to live up too.

[Purple]

@purple
Yet, again there are various limitations considering they couldn't add any models into the game if I'm not mistaken.
To implicate some news features must be impracticable.

Adding to the experience of premium members doesn't necessarily require adding new models.

[paranoia]

@purple
Yet, again there are various limitations considering they couldn't add any models into the game if I'm not mistaken.
To implicate some news features must be impracticable.

Adding to the experience of premium members doesn't necessarily require adding new models.

Well in some ways adding to the member's experience needs new models. You can't just add the level cap and a fast experience gain rate only. It would be better to have a membership item bonus rather then boosted rates on certain things.

[Purple]

@purple
Yet, again there are various limitations considering they couldn't add any models into the game if I'm not mistaken.
To implicate some news features must be impracticable.

Adding to the experience of premium members doesn't necessarily require adding new models.

Well in some ways adding to the member's experience needs new models. You can't just add the level cap and a fast experience gain rate only. It would be better to have a membership item bonus rather then boosted rates on certain things.

I never specified how they could add to the premium player's experience, you're setting restraints when you shouldn't be. It would be up to Zylon Gaming to come up with how to do that effectively.

[paranoia]

@purple
Yet, again there are various limitations considering they couldn't add any models into the game if I'm not mistaken.
To implicate some news features must be impracticable.

Adding to the experience of premium members doesn't necessarily require adding new models.

Well in some ways adding to the member's experience needs new models. You can't just add the level cap and a fast experience gain rate only. It would be better to have a membership item bonus rather then boosted rates on certain things.

I never specified how they could add to the premium player's experience, you're setting restraints when you shouldn't be. It would be up to Zylon Gaming to come up with how to do that effectively.

I'm trying to point out the obvious in hopes of change.

[Bombz]

Cool idea I assume but not really necessary

@Allie that's a horrible idea

[Cooky]

Stashes are just additional storage, easier to use than the marketplace, and don't have a real impact on the game.

true.

my question is:

then why would removing stashes motivate people to buy membership?

[JustRK]

well without regards to what anyone else said, I think this is a pretty neat idea. I think it would make armor distinction a little bit harder, but definitely would throw in a unique spin to the game that everyone can see.

[paranoia]

Stashes are just additional storage, easier to use than the marketplace, and don't have a real impact on the game.

true.

my question is:

then why would removing stashes motivate people to buy membership?

If she removes stashes we should at least be able to still remain with one. It motivates people to buy it if they wanna collect rares or save some coin items for later.

[paranoia]

Bump.

[Killer454]

Sounds good to me . Some parts just don't look alright together . In PVP/BVB The Player's colors are the same and it makes it look cool. Its the same with other sets like Raid ones being in the same Color Scheme.