BoutCheetah

Other => GFX => Topic started by: Vobck on May 11, 2014, 12:13:43 AM

Title: more
Post by: Vobck on May 11, 2014, 12:13:43 AM
(http://i.gyazo.com/0d462b461538af212c2a233365093512.png)
Quote from: Iridion on May 06, 2014, 03:58:15 PM
angry ****in rod style

this is just a revamp from my old crysis sig. something more srs than my wukong sig

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: more
Post by: BlackStickre on May 11, 2014, 01:32:36 AM
You keeping making awesome sigs man, hope I can get as good as you one day...
Title: Re: more
Post by: Iridion on May 11, 2014, 02:18:28 AM
hey dude its me who decides wether its angry rod style OR NOT ok?!
Title: Re: more
Post by: Rossbach on May 11, 2014, 02:22:14 AM
Quote from: Iridion on May 11, 2014, 02:18:28 AM
hey dude its me who decides wether its angry rod style OR NOT ok?!


But he quoted you...
Title: Re: more
Post by: qolderman on May 11, 2014, 02:54:02 AM
these black things on sides make sig look bad imo
Title: Re: more
Post by: Iridion on May 11, 2014, 02:58:00 AM
Quote from: Rossbach on May 11, 2014, 02:22:14 AM
Quote from: Iridion on May 11, 2014, 02:18:28 AM
hey dude its me who decides wether its angry rod style OR NOT ok?!


But he quoted you...

go play sector somewhere
Title: Re: more
Post by: Cooky on May 11, 2014, 12:32:52 PM
Quote from: qolderman on May 11, 2014, 02:54:02 AM
these black things on sides make sig look bad imo

kinda agree with this
Title: Re: more
Post by: 123bomb123 on May 11, 2014, 03:16:50 PM
meh

4/10 not angry rod enough
Title: Re: more
Post by: Vobck on May 11, 2014, 04:48:05 PM
Quote from: 123bomb123 on May 11, 2014, 03:16:50 PM
meh

4/10 not angry rod enough

wow this was very constructive learnt a lot from it!!!!
Title: Re: more
Post by: 123bomb123 on May 11, 2014, 05:26:15 PM
Quote from: Vobck on May 11, 2014, 04:48:05 PM
Quote from: 123bomb123 on May 11, 2014, 03:16:50 PM
meh

4/10 not angry rod enough

wow this was very constructive learnt a lot from it!!!!
ok it looks like u took a pic added render messed lighting
then added unnecessarily large c4d/effect whatever black things to the side and added light ball things u use a lot

I don't get the lighting at the top, too much for me
Title: Re: more
Post by: knightofms on May 11, 2014, 06:13:31 PM
both sides are kinda dark.. lack of lighting
Title: Re: more
Post by: Vobck on May 11, 2014, 08:46:36 PM
Quote from: 123bomb123 on May 11, 2014, 05:26:15 PM
Quote from: Vobck on May 11, 2014, 04:48:05 PM
Quote from: 123bomb123 on May 11, 2014, 03:16:50 PM
meh

4/10 not angry rod enough

wow this was very constructive learnt a lot from it!!!!
ok it looks like u took a pic added render messed lighting
then added unnecessarily large c4d/effect whatever black things to the side and added light ball things u use a lot

I don't get the lighting at the top, too much for me
thanks, that was constructive! (i mean it)

and to everyone complaining about the darkening and its not lack of lightning (it has too much light tbh and z mentioned it), its for depth

but sure, take a version without the darkening even though there will be almost no depth
(http://i.gyazo.com/b6bdaf44132afa95102498ca3fcd8f3f.png)
Title: Re: more
Post by: spiderstar on May 11, 2014, 11:28:45 PM
Flow seems a little weird (probably just me)
The C4D is going at an awkward angle especially with the background.
Your C4D spam this time (or the "angry rod style") isn't as appealing as your other works.  This is probably due to the lack of action in the render itself.  If there's no action in the render and you spam C4D's its gonna look pretty weird. 

Title: Re: more
Post by: 123bomb123 on May 11, 2014, 11:31:58 PM
The body of the render looks so plain and solid

maybe because I'm looking at it in low brightness on my phone tho heh
Title: Re: more
Post by: Iridion on May 12, 2014, 02:05:42 PM
just do some angry rod thingy again
Title: Re: more
Post by: Vobck on May 12, 2014, 04:12:38 PM
ok i will its just so i wanted to see if you (iri) would say the same thing again
r.i.p