[Xrow]

Do you believe that life was spontaneously generated from nonliving chemicals? (Yes or no)

[Optimism]

Yes and no XD.

[Xrow]

Why are you so afraid to answer truthfully, Opti?

[Optimism]

Why are you so afraid to answer truthfully, Opti?

I already have answered truthfully. You just reject this answer as truth.

Lol @ your rants about subjectivity and objectivity. Made me laugh, hard.

[Xrow]

Sigh.
Can't be yes and no, Opti. Remember absolute truth exists.

Either you believe that life spontaneously generated from nonliving chemicals (atheist), or you believe that life did not spontaneously generate from nonliving chemicals. Which is it?

[Corr]

No.

/discussion.

[Optimism]

Sigh.
Can't be yes and no, Opti. Remember absolute truth exists.

Either you believe that life spontaneously generated from nonliving chemicals (atheist), or you believe that life did not spontaneously generate from nonliving chemicals. Which is it?

Being content with "I don't know" won't get us anywhere, now will it?

Of course it will. We don't know until something is proven. This doesn't mean an effort won't be made to determine truth.

Man, you seriously are something of a confused child ;/.

Btw, you've stated yet another logical fallacy (slippery slope). Nice one. I suggest you go read up on those, brah.

I honestly feel bad for you at this point.

[Xrow]

I don't care what you feel, to be honest. I am being objective.

Apparently this is why you fail to progress - you are afraid of the truth. Sad.

[Corr]

I change my answer.

Yes.

/discussion.

[Optimism]

I change my answer.

Yes.

/discussion.

That answer is just as idiotic as no .

[Corr]

But it's an answer.

[Optimism]

But it's an answer.

So is, "I don't know".

Yay!

[Corr]

Too bad it's the odd, and therefore the wrong and irregular.

[Xrow]

So what your saying is that you don't believe anything because nothing can be proven?

[Optimism]

So what your saying is that you don't believe anything because nothing can be proven?

I don't jump to conclusions without evidence establishing validity firstly. Its that simple. That doesn't mean I won't make an attempt to establish truth.

Understand yet?

**** YOU CORR. You managed to spark a break through...in three posts.

<^>

[Corr]

I'm saw ****ing praw.

You can't touch my sty.

[Optimism]

I'm saw ****ing praw.

You can't touch my sty.

Prawstytute?

...

>.>

[Xrow]

Of course I do.
You don't believe anything because nothing can be proven.

You are a subjective, nonatheist, relativist who believes nothing.
Got it.

[Corr]

And you just simply agreed to what he said.

Congrats, would you like me to tell you how?

[Optimism]

Of course I do.
You don't believe anything because nothing can be proven.

You are a subjective, nonatheist, relativist who believes nothing.
Got it.

I WIN.

[Xrow]

Your lack of reason has lost me.

[Corr]

Double negative = Positive.

Read second sentence.

Sorry opti, I won this.

[Xrow]

"You don't believe anything because nothing can be proven." ...?

[Corr]

Indeed.

Way to agree with him.

[Optimism]

I'm lost. I still won.

[Corr]

But your loss.
Since lost, you lose.

I won. Winrar, topic lock.

[Xrow]

o.O..
I lied.

"You believe almost nothing because almost nothing can be proven."
Some things can be, but most cant.
Even if all reason, logic and cognitive certainty point to something being true, he chooses not to believe it because it technically isn't proven. Therefore he can believe almost nothing.

[Optimism]

But your loss.
Since lost, you lose.

I won. Winrar, topic lock.

FEIN.

[Allie]

I believe that non-living chemicals did indeed create life.
Why?
Because I'm an athiest and there's no other explanation.
Opti's view: Because there's no other explanation, he can't jump to this conclusion.
All he knows is pixie's didn't make them.
Because it's unlikely non-living chemicals created it, his answer is valid: he does not know.