BoutCheetah

BoutCheetah Community => ScreenShots => Topic started by: 5thnbg on November 17, 2011, 04:18:32 PM

Title: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: 5thnbg on November 17, 2011, 04:18:32 PM
Special thanks to my bro : Resolution
Cheers mate.
Also i want to add that no rb was used.
(http://i42.tinypic.com/2vd5hfp.jpg)

(http://i43.tinypic.com/opdbio.jpg)

And some lvl 215

(http://i44.tinypic.com/675en4.jpg)

Title: Re: New lvl 221 record(i think)
Post by: Click on November 17, 2011, 04:44:34 PM
nice.  :P
Title: Re: New lvl 221 record(i think)
Post by: eco999 on November 17, 2011, 05:41:23 PM
its not a new record
Title: Re: New lvl 221 record(i think)
Post by: 5thnbg on November 17, 2011, 05:47:20 PM
Quote from: eco999 on November 17, 2011, 05:41:23 PM
its not a new record
cawk why you edited?
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: denilligaal on November 17, 2011, 06:00:15 PM
well idk what the rec is but so far i think i still got the rec of fastest time solo at 215 with 1.01 havent seen anyone solo it faster :) but damn 0.55 iz nice but i think GM gramps had a faster one
Title: Re: New lvl 221 record(i think)
Post by: Meteor on November 17, 2011, 06:08:14 PM
Quote from: eco999 on November 17, 2011, 05:41:23 PM
its not a new record
« Last Edit: Today at 02:45:48 PM by hawk5005 »
Lool power abuse!!
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: mhj on November 17, 2011, 06:13:48 PM
I almost solo'ed 215 faster (0:59). Solo'ed 221 faster (3:07).
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: 5thnbg on November 17, 2011, 06:18:45 PM
Quote from: denilligaal on November 17, 2011, 06:00:15 PM
well idk what the rec is but so far i think i still got the rec of fastest time solo at 215 with 1.01 havent seen anyone solo it faster :) but damn 0.55 iz nice but i think GM gramps had a faster one
Gramps has that GM gun that has around twice the dmg of the DM.
I know that cawk power abuses.
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: mhj on November 17, 2011, 06:21:31 PM
GM gun shouldn't count. Other staff items are okay since they can be replaced with better stuff. But GM gun is so OP. It makes your hit twice as good.
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: KillerPig on November 17, 2011, 06:41:24 PM
omfg you actually changed ur name to BlooLait. trololol
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: 5thnbg on November 17, 2011, 06:42:47 PM
Quote from: KillerPig on November 17, 2011, 06:41:24 PM
omfg you actually changed ur name to BlooLait. trololol
Yeah piggy just for you.
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: RedNeon on November 17, 2011, 09:24:35 PM
soloing would be cooler then with someone
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Gramps on November 18, 2011, 05:09:59 AM
Quote from: mhj on November 17, 2011, 06:21:31 PM
GM gun shouldn't count. Other staff items are okay since they can be replaced with better stuff. But GM gun is so OP. It makes your hit twice as good.

Without bs, way worse than DM.
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Energized on November 18, 2011, 06:03:58 AM
Quote from: Gramps on November 18, 2011, 05:09:59 AM
Quote from: mhj on November 17, 2011, 06:21:31 PM
GM gun shouldn't count. Other staff items are okay since they can be replaced with better stuff. But GM gun is so OP. It makes your hit twice as good.

Without bs, way worse than DM.
So true :D
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: 5thnbg on November 18, 2011, 10:22:26 AM
Quote from: Energized on November 18, 2011, 06:03:58 AM
Quote from: Gramps on November 18, 2011, 05:09:59 AM
Quote from: mhj on November 17, 2011, 06:21:31 PM
GM gun shouldn't count. Other staff items are okay since they can be replaced with better stuff. But GM gun is so OP. It makes your hit twice as good.

Without bs, way worse than DM.
So true :D
You dont even know what GM gun is...
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: hawk5005 on November 18, 2011, 12:25:51 PM
You wanna know why I edited?
Because he spammed 89 point random letters after saying "its not a new record".
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Energized on November 18, 2011, 12:34:13 PM
Quote from: 5thnbg on November 18, 2011, 10:22:26 AM
Quote from: Energized on November 18, 2011, 06:03:58 AM
Quote from: Gramps on November 18, 2011, 05:09:59 AM
Quote from: mhj on November 17, 2011, 06:21:31 PM
GM gun shouldn't count. Other staff items are okay since they can be replaced with better stuff. But GM gun is so OP. It makes your hit twice as good.

Without bs, way worse than DM.
So true :D
You dont even know what GM gun is...
Wanna bet?
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Yz on November 18, 2011, 12:35:14 PM
^ i will bet all my BS you don't know its exact damage without asking a GM first lol
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Energized on November 18, 2011, 12:36:56 PM
Quote from: Yz on November 18, 2011, 12:35:14 PM
^ i will bet all my BS you don't know its exact damage without asking a GM first lol
Really?
It's 3200 DMG.
I think.


Do you really need to take half the page with spaces?
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Yz on November 18, 2011, 12:38:01 PM
wrong
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Scythe on November 18, 2011, 12:40:24 PM
energy u nub spammer
stop using that space thing
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: ZeroUH on November 18, 2011, 12:42:04 PM
Not even close, Energized.
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: NeoKiller on November 18, 2011, 12:44:04 PM
It's something around 900 lol
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Click on November 18, 2011, 12:44:36 PM
Quote from: Yz on November 18, 2011, 12:38:01 PM
wrong
Is it that big of a thing to discus or argue about ? Leave energized alone, he is a spamming nob.
Title: Re: New lvl 221 personal record
Post by: Yz on November 18, 2011, 12:46:02 PM
Quote from: Affinity on November 18, 2011, 12:44:36 PM Leave energized alone, he is a spamming nob.

Wtf?.. You just broke my mind with hypocrisy... Telling us not to pick on him (which we weren't) then you insulted him lulz

Erm Ima lock this I think we can agree the discussion on the record has ended : D