have an option to change the lives value maybe 5-15?
I think it will be fun to have longer base matches when you can have more lives..
What do you think?
+1
Quote from: nanak tatum on January 20, 2014, 04:22:28 PM
+1 only because pvp has it any why not. But I would never use it because (i never play base) but when I do, it usually lasts to long for me.
+1, I like the idea.
+1
I agree.
Would be nice to have a lives value for players and another one for mercenaries.
+1
More lives because you can't use them well? No, that's your problem.
More lives for players = too much time for mercs to be killed, which turns it into a PvP match
Base matches can also be extremely time-consuming and intense, at least if both teams know how to play.
Ex: (http://i44.tinypic.com/333g611.png)
+1
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 04:18:31 AM
Base matches can also be extremely time-consuming and intense, at least if both teams know how to play.
Ex: (http://i44.tinypic.com/333g611.png)
that's why you can choose rather having more than 5 lives or just leaving it at 5 lives.
If you enjoy longer matches and more xp then set it to 6-15, if you like quick matches, then leave it at 5, simple.
I can only see this being useful for practicing/training someone at bvb
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 21, 2014, 01:31:36 PM
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 04:18:31 AM
Base matches can also be extremely time-consuming and intense, at least if both teams know how to play.
Ex: (http://i44.tinypic.com/333g611.png)
that's why you can choose rather having more than 5 lives or just leaving it at 5 lives.
If you enjoy longer matches and more xp then set it to 6-15, if you like quick matches, then leave it at 5, simple.
I just don't think that we need more lives to make the game last longer.
The players who have OP gear usually just rush the base and end the game within 1 min. The problem is not really the lack of lives but more the lack of balance towards gear.
Havin' more lives wouldn't have helped at all in that situation. Therefore I think havin' more lives seems pretty un-needed.
It will not fit into skilled players gamestyle as well as stated above. So for what group of players is this beneficial to, other than people who are practicing on different aspects of the best mode in the game aka BvB.
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 02:30:55 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 21, 2014, 01:31:36 PM
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 04:18:31 AM
Base matches can also be extremely time-consuming and intense, at least if both teams know how to play.
Ex: (http://i44.tinypic.com/333g611.png)
that's why you can choose rather having more than 5 lives or just leaving it at 5 lives.
If you enjoy longer matches and more xp then set it to 6-15, if you like quick matches, then leave it at 5, simple.
I just don't think that we need more lives to make the game last longer.
The players who have OP gear usually just rush the base and end the game within 1 min. The problem is not really the lack of lives but more the lack of balance towards gear.
Havin' more lives wouldn't have helped at all in that situation. Therefore I think havin' more lives seems pretty un-needed.
It will not fit into skilled players game style as well as stated above. So for what group of players is this beneficial to, other than people who are practicing on different aspects of the best mode in the game aka BvB.
At 1st, Admins created a magic tag, called "No OP Items"
2nd, when you play a base game, all you need is to clear the merces 1st right? now, after you're done, your base is defenceless and you can attack it, and you're done, making 6-15 lives makes players to have more chances to defence their base and more chances to survive longer, Make sense?
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 21, 2014, 02:58:50 PM
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 02:30:55 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 21, 2014, 01:31:36 PM
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 04:18:31 AM
Base matches can also be extremely time-consuming and intense, at least if both teams know how to play.
Ex: (http://i44.tinypic.com/333g611.png)
that's why you can choose rather having more than 5 lives or just leaving it at 5 lives.
If you enjoy longer matches and more xp then set it to 6-15, if you like quick matches, then leave it at 5, simple.
I just don't think that we need more lives to make the game last longer.
The players who have OP gear usually just rush the base and end the game within 1 min. The problem is not really the lack of lives but more the lack of balance towards gear.
Havin' more lives wouldn't have helped at all in that situation. Therefore I think havin' more lives seems pretty un-needed.
It will not fit into skilled players game style as well as stated above. So for what group of players is this beneficial to, other than people who are practicing on different aspects of the best mode in the game aka BvB.
At 1st, Admins created a magic tag, called "No OP Items"
2nd, when you play a base game, all you need is to clear the merces 1st right? now, after you're done, your base is defenceless and you can attack it, and you're done, making 6-15 lives makes players to have more chances to defence their base and more chances to survive longer, Make sense?
That's why I said skilled players. They usually have op tag on, if not it is because they want some random players to join op or not.
You don't have to kill all mercs. It variates from match to match. There is no specific way to end a game unless everything goes as planned. You have defenders who will defend the mercs and the base, making it hard for the attackers (merc pushers) to do their job.
The wait time on getting resurrected is not short. Killing a base is pretty easy if your whole team is helping and some of the enemies are dead.
Sooo, no, it doesn't make sense, but that's not your fault. You are just here to help, right? Even though you have zero knowledge about the mode.
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 03:10:58 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 21, 2014, 02:58:50 PM
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 02:30:55 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 21, 2014, 01:31:36 PM
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 04:18:31 AM
Base matches can also be extremely time-consuming and intense, at least if both teams know how to play.
Ex: (http://i44.tinypic.com/333g611.png)
that's why you can choose rather having more than 5 lives or just leaving it at 5 lives.
If you enjoy longer matches and more xp then set it to 6-15, if you like quick matches, then leave it at 5, simple.
I just don't think that we need more lives to make the game last longer.
The players who have OP gear usually just rush the base and end the game within 1 min. The problem is not really the lack of lives but more the lack of balance towards gear.
Havin' more lives wouldn't have helped at all in that situation. Therefore I think havin' more lives seems pretty un-needed.
It will not fit into skilled players game style as well as stated above. So for what group of players is this beneficial to, other than people who are practicing on different aspects of the best mode in the game aka BvB.
At 1st, Admins created a magic tag, called "No OP Items"
2nd, when you play a base game, all you need is to clear the merces 1st right? now, after you're done, your base is defenceless and you can attack it, and you're done, making 6-15 lives makes players to have more chances to defence their base and more chances to survive longer, Make sense?
im not rly good at base tbh :(
stfu ur guido cant talk
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 03:10:58 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 21, 2014, 02:58:50 PM
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 02:30:55 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 21, 2014, 01:31:36 PM
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 04:18:31 AM
Base matches can also be extremely time-consuming and intense, at least if both teams know how to play.
Ex: (http://i44.tinypic.com/333g611.png)
that's why you can choose rather having more than 5 lives or just leaving it at 5 lives.
If you enjoy longer matches and more xp then set it to 6-15, if you like quick matches, then leave it at 5, simple.
I just don't think that we need more lives to make the game last longer.
The players who have OP gear usually just rush the base and end the game within 1 min. The problem is not really the lack of lives but more the lack of balance towards gear.
Havin' more lives wouldn't have helped at all in that situation. Therefore I think havin' more lives seems pretty un-needed.
It will not fit into skilled players game style as well as stated above. So for what group of players is this beneficial to, other than people who are practicing on different aspects of the best mode in the game aka BvB.
At 1st, Admins created a magic tag, called "No OP Items"
2nd, when you play a base game, all you need is to clear the merces 1st right? now, after you're done, your base is defenceless and you can attack it, and you're done, making 6-15 lives makes players to have more chances to defence their base and more chances to survive longer, Make sense?
That's why I said skilled players. They usually have op tag on, if not it is because they want some random players to join op or not.
You don't have to kill all mercs. It variates from match to match. There is no specific way to end a game unless everything goes as planned. You have defenders who will defend the mercs and the base, making it hard for the attackers (merc pushers) to do their job.
The wait time on getting resurrected is not short. Killing a base is pretty easy if your whole team is helping and some of the enemies are dead.
Sooo, no, it doesn't make sense, but that's not your fault. You are just here to help, right? Even though you have zero knowledge about the mode.
I do have allot of knowledge about base, I play base allot.
There are some situations (as you say in your post) with good players, and as they push all merces and players, there are no left and they destroy the base, having more lives makes the match longer as you can spawn more times, and defence the base a bit longer.
Just an idea do get Xp cap faster and enjoy a longer game.
I'm just going to intervene here...
In reality, this is a bad update because playing a base game with more lives gives incompetent players too many chances after they have clearly messed up 5 times. This gives players way too many chances to fend off an oncoming rush. It also gives people way too many chances to kill mercenaries. As a result, this kind of update will make the game more PvP based (ie stall). If you want to play PvP, then go ahead and play PvP. In my opinion, it's not wise to make BvB like PvP and vice versa. There's a reason that they're 2 completely different modes.
Charmz, you're not good at base. You're actually pretty bad, and ironically, you blame all of your losses on "lag" even though you live in Israel and have a high ping when compared to other players. With a remote location such as yours (and thus, a poor connection and high ping), most of your matches are going to be very laggy. I've never once seen Sirhamtaro (a player from New Zealand) complain about lag when losing. That lag actually works largely in your favor since most of your matchups are going to be the same connection-wise (lag-wise). Think about it this way. A player who does not live in a remote location faces players who live nearby and far away. This means that they have to be prepared for more different types of matchups, unlike a player that lives in a remote location.
tl;dr
This update is bad, and you need to get rid of your ego because you're bad.
so much **** sucking
ur makin ur mom very proud xd
Quote from: Dewo on January 21, 2014, 05:42:31 PM
so much **** sucking
ur makin ur mom very proud xd
please stop
i already proved you wrong on skype
Quote from: Epic xD on January 21, 2014, 04:53:52 PM
I'm just going to intervene here...
In reality, this is a bad update because playing a base game with more lives gives incompetent players too many chances after they have clearly messed up 5 times. This gives players way too many chances to fend off an oncoming rush. It also gives people way too many chances to kill mercenaries. As a result, this kind of update will make the game more PvP based (ie stall). If you want to play PvP, then go ahead and play PvP. In my opinion, it's not wise to make BvB like PvP and vice versa. There's a reason that they're 2 completely different modes.
Charmz, you're not good at base. You're actually pretty bad, and ironically, you blame all of your losses on "lag" even though you live in Israel and have a high ping when compared to other players. With a remote location such as yours (and thus, a poor connection and high ping), most of your matches are going to be very laggy. I've never once seen Sirhamtaro (a player from New Zealand) complain about lag when losing. That lag actually works largely in your favor since most of your matchups are going to be the same connection-wise (lag-wise). Think about it this way. A player who does not live in a remote location faces players who live nearby and far away. This means that they have to be prepared for more different types of matchups, unlike a player that lives in a remote location.
tl;dr
This update is bad, and you need to get rid of your ego because you're bad.
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me, I know I'm pretty good..
about your other sentence, although I live in far country and I get teleport pushes doesn't make it "not lag", Yes, Maybe is it my fault 'cause I'm living in far country, but it's still a lag.
About it, this is talking PvP, and I Didn't BvB you ever (as far as I can remember) and I never say someone lags when it comes to BvB, so I suggest remembering properly B4 you say something stupid as this..
and what do you mean by ego? I almost never talk to you, and if I'm bad, you're worse..
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 22, 2014, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: Epic xD on January 21, 2014, 04:53:52 PM
I'm just going to intervene here...
In reality, this is a bad update because playing a base game with more lives gives incompetent players too many chances after they have clearly messed up 5 times. This gives players way too many chances to fend off an oncoming rush. It also gives people way too many chances to kill mercenaries. As a result, this kind of update will make the game more PvP based (ie stall). If you want to play PvP, then go ahead and play PvP. In my opinion, it's not wise to make BvB like PvP and vice versa. There's a reason that they're 2 completely different modes.
Charmz, you're not good at base. You're actually pretty bad, and ironically, you blame all of your losses on "lag" even though you live in Israel and have a high ping when compared to other players. With a remote location such as yours (and thus, a poor connection and high ping), most of your matches are going to be very laggy. I've never once seen Sirhamtaro (a player from New Zealand) complain about lag when losing. That lag actually works largely in your favor since most of your matchups are going to be the same connection-wise (lag-wise). Think about it this way. A player who does not live in a remote location faces players who live nearby and far away. This means that they have to be prepared for more different types of matchups, unlike a player that lives in a remote location.
tl;dr
This update is bad, and you need to get rid of your ego because you're bad.
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me, I know I'm pretty good..
about your other sentence, although I live in far country and I get teleport pushes doesn't make it "not lag", Yes, Maybe is it my fault 'cause I'm living in far country, but it's still a lag.
About it, this is talking PvP, and I Didn't BvB you ever (as far as I can remember) and I never say someone lags when it comes to BvB, so I suggest remembering properly B4 you say something stupid as this..
and what do you mean by ego? I almost never talk to you, and if I'm bad, you're worse..
pls stop
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 22, 2014, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: Epic xD on January 21, 2014, 04:53:52 PM
I'm just going to intervene here...
In reality, this is a bad update because playing a base game with more lives gives incompetent players too many chances after they have clearly messed up 5 times. This gives players way too many chances to fend off an oncoming rush. It also gives people way too many chances to kill mercenaries. As a result, this kind of update will make the game more PvP based (ie stall). If you want to play PvP, then go ahead and play PvP. In my opinion, it's not wise to make BvB like PvP and vice versa. There's a reason that they're 2 completely different modes.
Charmz, you're not good at base. You're actually pretty bad, and ironically, you blame all of your losses on "lag" even though you live in Israel and have a high ping when compared to other players. With a remote location such as yours (and thus, a poor connection and high ping), most of your matches are going to be very laggy. I've never once seen Sirhamtaro (a player from New Zealand) complain about lag when losing. That lag actually works largely in your favor since most of your matchups are going to be the same connection-wise (lag-wise). Think about it this way. A player who does not live in a remote location faces players who live nearby and far away. This means that they have to be prepared for more different types of matchups, unlike a player that lives in a remote location.
tl;dr
This update is bad, and you need to get rid of your ego because you're bad.
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me, I know I'm pretty good..
about your other sentence, although I live in far country and I get teleport pushes doesn't make it "not lag", Yes, Maybe is it my fault 'cause I'm living in far country, but it's still a lag.
About it, this is talking PvP, and I Didn't BvB you ever (as far as I can remember) and I never say someone lags when it comes to BvB, so I suggest remembering properly B4 you say something stupid as this..
and what do you mean by ego? I almost never talk to you, and if I'm bad, you're worse..
I am sure Lyfe kicks your ass at bvb.
OT: i suggested this before and got feedback on it and it wouldn't improve bvb and it will not increase exp (which you use as argument) because with the 5 lives you already hit max exp cap.
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 22, 2014, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: Epic xD on January 21, 2014, 04:53:52 PM
I'm just going to intervene here...
In reality, this is a bad update because playing a base game with more lives gives incompetent players too many chances after they have clearly messed up 5 times. This gives players way too many chances to fend off an oncoming rush. It also gives people way too many chances to kill mercenaries. As a result, this kind of update will make the game more PvP based (ie stall). If you want to play PvP, then go ahead and play PvP. In my opinion, it's not wise to make BvB like PvP and vice versa. There's a reason that they're 2 completely different modes.
Charmz, you're not good at base. You're actually pretty bad, and ironically, you blame all of your losses on "lag" even though you live in Israel and have a high ping when compared to other players. With a remote location such as yours (and thus, a poor connection and high ping), most of your matches are going to be very laggy. I've never once seen Sirhamtaro (a player from New Zealand) complain about lag when losing. That lag actually works largely in your favor since most of your matchups are going to be the same connection-wise (lag-wise). Think about it this way. A player who does not live in a remote location faces players who live nearby and far away. This means that they have to be prepared for more different types of matchups, unlike a player that lives in a remote location.
tl;dr
This update is bad, and you need to get rid of your ego because you're bad.
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me, I know I'm pretty good..
about your other sentence, although I live in far country and I get teleport pushes doesn't make it "not lag", Yes, Maybe is it my fault 'cause I'm living in far country, but it's still a lag.
About it, this is talking PvP, and I Didn't BvB you ever (as far as I can remember) and I never say someone lags when it comes to BvB, so I suggest remembering properly B4 you say something stupid as this..
and what do you mean by ego? I almost never talk to you, and if I'm bad, you're worse..
hes like the absolute god of base
some say, he eats bases for breakfast
some say, he can win base while sectoring
all we know is, he's called the lufe!
Life sucks bro, but lyfe is pretty awesome too.
@That other guy- dude you fail at base, seriously. Compared to Pig/Lyfe/me anybody even silver who's a PvPer (fyi), you fail in comparison. Wanna prove you're actually good? Win 5 base games in a row (4v4) and get MVP every time with even teams. Then we can talk about shit like that. xd
Oh ya forgot, with op tag on aswell.
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 22, 2014, 10:46:04 AM
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me
the beginning of the end lmao
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 22, 2014, 10:46:04 AM
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me, I know I'm pretty good..
about your other sentence, although I live in far country and I get teleport pushes doesn't make it "not lag", Yes, Maybe is it my fault 'cause I'm living in far country, but it's still a lag.
About it, this is talking PvP, and I Didn't BvB you ever (as far as I can remember) and I never say someone lags when it comes to BvB, so I suggest remembering properly B4 you say something stupid as this..
and what do you mean by ego? I almost never talk to you, and if I'm bad, you're worse..
Go ahead and try to beat you? Err, I've beaten you countless times. I've beaten you on a 2v1 (you and aln vs me when I was using a ram), and I've beaten you with an account below level 100. Kid, you need to get rid of that ego because the ZeaL players were basically setting you up for success because we pair the WORST people with the BEST people to make the matches as fair as possible. You're basically the equivalent of the kid who cheats off the person sitting next to them on a test; then, you proceed to brag about how good you are, even though WE were setting you up for success. Also, you never even placed well on the rankings (never get above a couple of pks and mks).
As for you being better than me. Okay. LOL. Kid, I've been playing this game off-and-on since November 2006, and I have loads of experience and knowledge about BvB (and the whole game). I also have the reputation of being the best baser in BC, and I was considered one of the best in all of Bots. You need a reality check because the way BvB is played by the best players today is largely modeled after Pulkit, Giga, Hulk, Corr, and myself. You have contributed absolutely nothing to BvB. End of story.
You misunderstood what I meant about lag. Since you live in a remote location, virtually all of your opponents will be laggy to you; as a result, blaming lag is not a viable excuse because EVERYONE WILL LAG TO YOU ANYWAYS. If you were good at this game, you would be able to use your lag to your advantage; however, you clearly cannot use your lag effectively. You're blaming the one and only redeeming factor about yourself, which is your lag.
tl;dr
me (Lyfe/Twist of Fate) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
u can b top of base ranking by always being offense and killin merczzzz
Quote from: Iridion on January 22, 2014, 02:58:15 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 22, 2014, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: Epic xD on January 21, 2014, 04:53:52 PM
I'm just going to intervene here...
In reality, this is a bad update because playing a base game with more lives gives incompetent players too many chances after they have clearly messed up 5 times. This gives players way too many chances to fend off an oncoming rush. It also gives people way too many chances to kill mercenaries. As a result, this kind of update will make the game more PvP based (ie stall). If you want to play PvP, then go ahead and play PvP. In my opinion, it's not wise to make BvB like PvP and vice versa. There's a reason that they're 2 completely different modes.
Charmz, you're not good at base. You're actually pretty bad, and ironically, you blame all of your losses on "lag" even though you live in Israel and have a high ping when compared to other players. With a remote location such as yours (and thus, a poor connection and high ping), most of your matches are going to be very laggy. I've never once seen Sirhamtaro (a player from New Zealand) complain about lag when losing. That lag actually works largely in your favor since most of your matchups are going to be the same connection-wise (lag-wise). Think about it this way. A player who does not live in a remote location faces players who live nearby and far away. This means that they have to be prepared for more different types of matchups, unlike a player that lives in a remote location.
tl;dr
This update is bad, and you need to get rid of your ego because you're bad.
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me, I know I'm pretty good..
about your other sentence, although I live in far country and I get teleport pushes doesn't make it "not lag", Yes, Maybe is it my fault 'cause I'm living in far country, but it's still a lag.
About it, this is talking PvP, and I Didn't BvB you ever (as far as I can remember) and I never say someone lags when it comes to BvB, so I suggest remembering properly B4 you say something stupid as this..
and what do you mean by ego? I almost never talk to you, and if I'm bad, you're worse..
hes like the absolute god of base
some say, he eats bases for breakfast
some say, he can win base while sectoring
all we know is, he's called the lufe!
Oh, just saying, I know he's better, but he was talking about ego, and here he is, saying I sux and He's legend and stuff.. anyway made me a bit mad, Dewo, I'm sure you're better, but I'm still good, I'm not bad..
Oh and just for the record, I didn't have slightness idea you're lyfe, Thought you're Epic by your name. sry bout that..
Quote from: nanak tatum on January 23, 2014, 04:02:40 AM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 23, 2014, 04:00:45 AM
Quote from: Iridion on January 22, 2014, 02:58:15 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 22, 2014, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: Epic xD on January 21, 2014, 04:53:52 PM
I'm just going to intervene here...
In reality, this is a bad update because playing a base game with more lives gives incompetent players too many chances after they have clearly messed up 5 times. This gives players way too many chances to fend off an oncoming rush. It also gives people way too many chances to kill mercenaries. As a result, this kind of update will make the game more PvP based (ie stall). If you want to play PvP, then go ahead and play PvP. In my opinion, it's not wise to make BvB like PvP and vice versa. There's a reason that they're 2 completely different modes.
Charmz, you're not good at base. You're actually pretty bad, and ironically, you blame all of your losses on "lag" even though you live in Israel and have a high ping when compared to other players. With a remote location such as yours (and thus, a poor connection and high ping), most of your matches are going to be very laggy. I've never once seen Sirhamtaro (a player from New Zealand) complain about lag when losing. That lag actually works largely in your favor since most of your matchups are going to be the same connection-wise (lag-wise). Think about it this way. A player who does not live in a remote location faces players who live nearby and far away. This means that they have to be prepared for more different types of matchups, unlike a player that lives in a remote location.
tl;dr
This update is bad, and you need to get rid of your ego because you're bad.
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me, I know I'm pretty good..
about your other sentence, although I live in far country and I get teleport pushes doesn't make it "not lag", Yes, Maybe is it my fault 'cause I'm living in far country, but it's still a lag.
About it, this is talking PvP, and I Didn't BvB you ever (as far as I can remember) and I never say someone lags when it comes to BvB, so I suggest remembering properly B4 you say something stupid as this..
and what do you mean by ego? I almost never talk to you, and if I'm bad, you're worse..
hes like the absolute god of base
some say, he eats bases for breakfast
some say, he can win base while sectoring
all we know is, he's called the lufe!
Oh, just saying, I know he's better, but he was talking about ego, and here he is, saying I sux and He's legend and stuff.. anyway made me a bit mad, Dewo, I'm sure you're better, but I'm still good, I'm not bad..
Correct that thread, I made a type mistake, some names mixed up in my mind.. o.0
Quote from: nanak tatum on January 23, 2014, 04:02:40 AM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 23, 2014, 04:00:45 AM
Quote from: Iridion on January 22, 2014, 02:58:15 PM
Quote from: mygodZzZ on January 22, 2014, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: Epic xD on January 21, 2014, 04:53:52 PM
I'm just going to intervene here...
In reality, this is a bad update because playing a base game with more lives gives incompetent players too many chances after they have clearly messed up 5 times. This gives players way too many chances to fend off an oncoming rush. It also gives people way too many chances to kill mercenaries. As a result, this kind of update will make the game more PvP based (ie stall). If you want to play PvP, then go ahead and play PvP. In my opinion, it's not wise to make BvB like PvP and vice versa. There's a reason that they're 2 completely different modes.
Charmz, you're not good at base. You're actually pretty bad, and ironically, you blame all of your losses on "lag" even though you live in Israel and have a high ping when compared to other players. With a remote location such as yours (and thus, a poor connection and high ping), most of your matches are going to be very laggy. I've never once seen Sirhamtaro (a player from New Zealand) complain about lag when losing. That lag actually works largely in your favor since most of your matchups are going to be the same connection-wise (lag-wise). Think about it this way. A player who does not live in a remote location faces players who live nearby and far away. This means that they have to be prepared for more different types of matchups, unlike a player that lives in a remote location.
tl;dr
This update is bad, and you need to get rid of your ego because you're bad.
BS! you're not better than me, so you can't even say that. go ahead an try to beat me, I know I'm pretty good..
about your other sentence, although I live in far country and I get teleport pushes doesn't make it "not lag", Yes, Maybe is it my fault 'cause I'm living in far country, but it's still a lag.
About it, this is talking PvP, and I Didn't BvB you ever (as far as I can remember) and I never say someone lags when it comes to BvB, so I suggest remembering properly B4 you say something stupid as this..
and what do you mean by ego? I almost never talk to you, and if I'm bad, you're worse..
hes like the absolute god of base
some say, he eats bases for breakfast
some say, he can win base while sectoring
all we know is, he's called the lufe!
Oh, just saying, I know he's better, but he was talking about ego, and here he is, saying I sux and He's legend and stuff.. anyway made me a bit mad, Dewo, I'm sure you're better, but I'm still good, I'm not bad..
The only reason for the contradiction is godzz got two people mixed up, basing lyfe's skills against some new person who probably never even heard of base ha, after realising their mistake corrected themself.
Wow, this turned into the longest suggestion thread ever. Way to go off topic guys >.< Could someone plz clean it up (take out all the off topic posts)?
And -1 to the tag. Although I think it might be fun rarely, it really is fine the way it is
Why did you skip the #'s 1-4 in regards to lives. I mean tournament / event wise you could settle 1v1's with a sudden death match and give everyone and merc only 1 life which seems pretty interesting to me.
Also for games that you know would last over 20 minutes you could reduce those to 3 lives which is a fair amount of respawns to correct strategy mid-game while still providing that danger of being close to the edge of elimination.
Quote from: JustRK on January 23, 2014, 05:52:48 AM
Why did you skip the #'s 1-4 in regards to lives. I mean tournament / event wise you could settle 1v1's with a sudden death match and give everyone and merc only 1 life which seems pretty interesting to me.
Also for games that you know would last over 20 minutes you could reduce those to 3 lives which is a fair amount of respawns to correct strategy mid-game while still providing that danger of being close to the edge of elimination.
Fair point, hadn't thought of that. That might be fun
Quote from: Thornz on January 23, 2014, 04:45:52 AM
Wow, this turned into the longest suggestion thread ever. Way to go off topic guys >.< Could someone plz clean it up (take out all the off topic posts)?
And -1 to the tag. Although I think it might be fun rarely, it really is fine the way it is
Yes, you're right.
This suggestion topic became really off topic (and I got into this situation myself), Please just right your opinion about the topic.
If you like it, then +1 all good ^_^ if you don't like it and choose to -1, also good,
this suggestion may good for some people and it's good I suggested this then.
It may not fit in some others minds, and it's ok, just say your opinion about it that's all.