BoutCheetah

Other => GFX => Topic started by: tanqq on December 22, 2010, 03:09:00 PM

Title: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: tanqq on December 22, 2010, 03:09:00 PM
(http://i1038.photobucket.com/albums/a464/tanqq1/25.png)

I know it's simple. Possibly ugly as well.Please cnc.
Title: Re: Simple Piplup sig.
Post by: Optimism on December 22, 2010, 03:10:35 PM
Its good, but to all GFXers here, work on flow* and depth*. If that sig had some flow, it would be far better; however, its just random.
Title: Re: Simple Piplup sig.
Post by: tanqq on December 22, 2010, 03:12:51 PM
Quote from: Optimism on December 22, 2010, 03:10:35 PM
Its good, but to all GFXers here, work on flow* and depth*. If that sig had some flow, it would be far better; however, its just random.
I expected far worse comments coming from a person with high standards :/
I need to work on those both aspects. I only used 1 watersplash brush in this sig.
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: qwerasdf2453 on December 22, 2010, 04:22:12 PM
i like it but i want renders to be showen more imo ::)
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: tanqq on December 23, 2010, 07:57:56 AM
*bump* More CNC please
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: hawk5005 on December 23, 2010, 08:06:45 AM
The sig is nice,good blending because of the steam you put in from of the render,but put your text closer to the render,because the text is in one side and the render in another,you will end up having two focal points(two different places to look at),if you have the text close to the render,there will be one focal point and it will make people think it's a much better signature.
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: Allie on December 23, 2010, 08:12:18 AM
(http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/7016/hawknb.png)

/multi-focal
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: hawk5005 on December 23, 2010, 08:16:47 AM
Quote from: Allie on December 23, 2010, 08:12:18 AM
(http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/7016/hawknb.png)

/multi-focal
Yes I made that special since there is no actual render there lol.
Title: Re: Simple Piplup sig.
Post by: Xrow on December 23, 2010, 08:25:39 AM
Quote from: tanqq on December 22, 2010, 03:12:51 PM
I expected far worse comments coming from a person with high standards :/

Que?
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: Allie on December 23, 2010, 08:28:43 AM
Multi-focal is good sometimes.
That was a compliment; it's difficult to make a multi-focal sig that actually works.
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: hawk5005 on December 23, 2010, 08:42:53 AM
Quote from: Allie on December 23, 2010, 08:28:43 AM
Multi-focal is good sometimes.
That was a compliment; it's difficult to make a multi-focal sig that actually works.
Sorry for the misunderstanding,indeed it's hard to make it,so for the new comers to photoshop,a single focal is perfect.
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: tanqq on December 23, 2010, 10:47:21 AM
Quote from: hawk5005 on December 23, 2010, 08:06:45 AM
The sig is nice,good blending because of the steam you put in from of the render,but put your text closer to the render,because the text is in one side and the render in another,you will end up having two focal points(two different places to look at),if you have the text close to the render,there will be one focal point and it will make people think it's a much better signature.
Thanks for the tips. When I placed the text near the render, the text seems invisible. So I rather place the text in a corner.

More CnC please ;P
Title: Re: CNC a Simple Pokemon sig.
Post by: Jason321 on December 23, 2010, 12:19:36 PM
Quote from: Allie on December 23, 2010, 08:12:18 AM
(http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/7016/hawknb.png)

I can see a render.