This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
227
GFX / Re: Having Problems Making A Skin
January 27, 2011, 02:20:48 AM
Because it would destroy eyes.
228
GFX / Re: mmiicc0
January 25, 2011, 12:29:10 AMQuote from: mmiicc0 on January 24, 2011, 12:30:14 PMJeff'll steal my abstractions
Wait what?
230
GFX / Re: Meta's Signature
January 24, 2011, 02:10:03 AM
Well this is rare; something I like. But the focal comet could be larger, the one in the background less distracting and the text better.
232
Quite bad for me, flat, compositionless... and that's not all.
233
and if you've been paying attention you'd realize that sort of no-blending sig is typically a vector style
235
GFX / Re: i watch a tut
January 20, 2011, 07:41:43 AMQuote from: Allie on January 19, 2011, 11:06:52 PMI only used it because that other guy said it was too lacking in color to be useful.
Everyone seems to use that render in this community.
Oh well, it's probly your best sig.
236
GFX / Re: New Sig/New Acc.
January 18, 2011, 01:37:21 PMQuote from: hawk5005 on January 18, 2011, 10:59:41 AMI mean all the really tiny words on the left.
I didn't even noticed the text xD , but I still think it's a nice sig .
237
GFX / Re: Choc's Epic Sig Shop (FREE OMFG) (RARE CHANCE)
January 18, 2011, 10:46:29 AMQuote from: hawk5005 on January 18, 2011, 09:18:32 AM
Woot abstract lines.
They're... just lines to me.
238
GFX / Re: New Sig/New Acc.
January 18, 2011, 10:44:28 AM
Once I get past all the micro text, it seems like very little was done to the left side at all.
239
GFX / Re: Choc's Epic Sig Shop (FREE OMFG) (RARE CHANCE)
January 18, 2011, 03:24:45 AM
the text is getting worse
and an abstract tends to be a lot better if there's something it actually represents.
and an abstract tends to be a lot better if there's something it actually represents.
240
GFX / Re: Signature
January 17, 2011, 01:59:23 AM
only an improvement because i can actually see $%#@.