Quote from: Meteor on October 10, 2013, 06:34:57 PM

Quote from: CyberSox on October 08, 2013, 08:07:54 PM

Quote from: Helix-Live on October 08, 2013, 07:43:52 PM
oh man is that negativ3

i remember someone called negativ3 from looong ago

One of the kings of lag.

pein will forever hold that title

Quote from: Selene on October 10, 2013, 04:43:13 PM
Idea: When you make an account and choose your Bot type, you'll get the parts of the Bot type you have chosen in a box called "starter BOT".
Items come with it:

Level 1 parts; head, body, arms, shield, arm part.
Gun (level 1)
Random wing (1 day)
Random flags (1 day)
Coin head (1 day)
Lucky E.F (1 day)
10k Gigas
Random gift

Disagree with random gift. Implies that there is a rare chance to actually get something good, meaning people might farm it. Another idea is to limit the gift box to once per account, so even if bot is remade they don't get a second

Quote from: Madprox on October 09, 2013, 03:33:00 PM
Where can you find your first post? .-.
I wonder what it was..

Community -> Profile -> Show the last posts of this person -> Click on last page -> Find your first post

Quote from: Helix-Live on October 08, 2013, 07:43:52 PM
oh man is that negativ3

i remember someone called negativ3 from looong ago

Quote from: Purple on October 08, 2013, 02:22:57 PM

Quote from: CyberSox on October 08, 2013, 02:16:01 PM

Quote from: Purple on October 08, 2013, 02:11:30 PM
Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

Adverts aren't convenient for the consumer, yet they are a part of most things. They are inconvenient for the non payer and better for those who pay. It's the same general concept.

It's not the same thing. Most adverts aren't inheritantly inconvenient. Some exceptions are ads that you have to wait to skip, ie. ad.fly, and pop-up ads. Even then, the ads on YouTube that you need to wait 3 seconds to skip aren't that inconvenient.

In an online game if you have to pay to get rid of inconvenient things, then it's a bad business model. If you can pay to make things MORE convenient, that's fine.

I'll use LoL as an example.

They sell experience boosts to help people level up faster. They don't make leveling inconvenient, but if you want to level up faster then you can spend a certain amount of money to shorten the amount of time that it takes to reach the level cap. It doesn't hurt the f2p user experience but can still give people a reason to be a premium member.

I don't know much about LoL, but I know it has a pretty big player base and makes a looooooooot of money. You can't compare a company that size to the Zylongaming, Zylon have to make money somehow. Also, you imply that they would be adding a feature that causes inconvenience, while in reality they are just changing a feature that already exists to make member benefits more appealing. Stashes are just additional storage, easier to use than the marketplace, and don't have a real impact on the game. I see nothing wrong with slightly altering one minor option of the game to increase income and satisfaction for new members.

Quote from: Purple on October 08, 2013, 02:11:30 PM
Giving convenience to people that pay is fine, purposely making something inconvenient for non-paying people is retarded.

Adverts aren't convenient for the consumer, yet they are a part of most things. They are inconvenient for the non payer and better for those who pay. It's the same general concept.

Quote from: Allie on October 08, 2013, 10:27:43 AM

Quote from: paranoia on October 08, 2013, 08:47:48 AM
It would be better as a NON-members benefit.

As of my recent update, many members are finding little benefit to paying extra.
If this was ever created, it would be strictly a members feature. We're already considering boosting some other features to member-only, such as stashes 1 and 2.

#bringbackpurpletext

7

Quote from: paranoia on October 05, 2013, 08:31:01 PM
Lier @ cybersox I just wanted to know chill man you act like I going to flirt with you or something.

I just said hi...why so defensive :s

hi :3

I see I was kicked out after one day Also aln you might want to change your personal statement..'redemption loyal member'

try updating java. always works for me

Quote from: ghostkid17 on October 01, 2013, 02:15:10 PM

Quote from: CyberSox on October 01, 2013, 02:13:56 PM
I just went on. Can someone explain what happened? 

A wither happened

I saw...and not just one... :s whyyy

I just went on. Can someone explain what happened? 

Quote from: paranoia on September 29, 2013, 03:00:33 PM
First off once a person has kick out another and their persistent in trying to join the room multiple times Baam cooky's idea falls into place. 
scenario :
Your waiting for your friend he is in the shop buying something then somebody starts comming in your room who you dont want so you kick them out they are persistent. Came in 5+ times your starting to get annoyed to avoid an confrontation use cooky idea baam 10 minute kick.

'Baam' close the slot until your friend is ready.

Quote from: Cooky on September 29, 2013, 01:13:28 PM

Quote from: CyberSox on September 29, 2013, 12:54:11 PM
which of those features restrict other players more than they were previously?

'guild only'
'min level'
'max level'
'max players'
'no op items'

was waiting for you to say that. without all of those the rm's would just kick anyway. kick timers actually change things.

Quote from: Cooky on September 29, 2013, 12:33:08 PM

Quote from: CyberSox on September 29, 2013, 12:31:34 PM
you can't add a feature that is only useful in certain times.

every room option in the game says hi

which of those features restrict other players more than they were previously?