Why do people need to see that? Why would people care that they do not need 9k kills to reach max drops? You also do not need 2k kills to reach max drop? According to your pic you killed mobs after the max, thus proof you don't need 2k. Yet you go ahead and post that? Who is to say that everyone knows Ross got 9k kills in a game, and somehow relate that reason to the purpose of ur second pic? Where is that in any way shape or forum shown to even be guessable on such a reason as per the second pic? If no one can understand it, then something must be wrong? Who is to say Ross actually did reach max drops in those 9k kills? How is that even a proper reason to post that pic? Why did you need to post a pic of 2k kills in order to prove you don't need 9k kills to reach max boxes? Yet again, why? Are even half of these questions on topic? That is the most retarded reason for anything that Ross has heard. Why does Ross even care about you only posting about the boxes? Just because your main focus was on boxes does not mean there are sub-sets within the pics that promote other pics? Is using "sub-sets" even a proper way to express one's self? Is it even a proper situation to put it in? Why is there so many questions? Can you answer all of these for Ross? He must be confused? How does the second pic even relate to boxes? Who is to say it was not faked? There is no proof that 2k kill game was the same game you got max boxes in a room? Why is there even a topic like this? There was already a few of these topics? How come you can only get 2k kills? Why does reaching max boxes even matter? Why would people want to know that you do not need 9k kills in order to reach max boxes, while also promoting you need 2k kills for it? It was never stated, however it seems hinted at? Because you took Ross' 9k kill pic as the amount needed for max boxes, despite it not even being about the amount to reach max boxes? Is something wrong with your math btw? 9k kills? Ross got nearly 10k kills? Are you gonna side step by saying, just because you got 10k kills does not matter towards the fact of "me" simply stating you do not need 9k kills to get max boxes? Thus effectively you can use any number over 2007 kills for that? Seems rather strange you pick 9k kills, and no other ones like, more than 2008 kills? Anyways going by the fact that your wrongfully kill-related amount towards reaching max boxes, to prove that you don't need 9k kills to reach max boxes, contradicts to your wrongfully kill-related pic? As it looks like you don't need 2k kills? Thus in effect makes you a hypocrite? So many questions =/? Anyways Ross will fill up some space with some filler? Who is to say it was not faked? There is no proof that 2k kill game was the same game you got max boxes in a room? Why is there even a topic like this? There was already a few of these topics? How come you can only get 2k kills? Why does reaching max boxes even matter? Why would people want to know that you do not need 9k kills in order to reach max boxes, while also promoting you need 2k kills for it? It was never stated, however it seems hinted at? Because you took Ross' 9k kill pic as the amount needed for max boxes, despite it not even being about the amount to reach max boxes? Is something wrong with your math btw? 9k kills? Ross got nearly 10k kills? Are you gonna side step by saying, just because you got 10k kills does not matter towards the fact of "me" simply stating you do not need 9k kills to get max boxes? Thus effectively you can use any number over 2007 kills for that? Seems rather strange you pick 9k kills, and no other ones like, more than 2008 kills? Anyways going by the fact that your wrongfully kill-related amount towards reaching max boxes, to prove that you don't need 9k kills to reach max boxes, contradicts to your wrongfully kill-related pic? Yet again, why? Are even half of these questions on topic? That is the most retarded reason for anything that Ross has heard. Why does Ross even care about you only posting about the boxes? Just because your main focus was on boxes does not mean there are sub-sets within the pics that promote other pics? Is using "sub-sets" even a proper way to express one's self? Is it even a proper situation to put it in? Why is there so many questions? Can you answer all of these for Ross? He must be confused? How does the second pic even relate to boxes? Who is to say it was not faked? There is no proof that 2k kill game was the same game you got max boxes in a room? Why is there even a topic like this? There was already a few of these topics? How come you can only get 2k kills? Why does reaching max boxes even matter? Why would people want to know that you do not need 9k kills in order to reach max boxes, while also promoting you need 2k kills for it? It was never stated, however it seems hinted at? Because you took Ross' 9k kill pic as the amount needed for max boxes, despite it not even being about the amount to reach max boxes? Is something wrong with your math btw? 9k kills? Ross got nearly 10k kills? Are you gonna side step by saying, just because you got 10k kills does not matter towards the fact of "me" simply stating you do not need 9k kills to get max boxes? Thus effectively you can use any number over 2007 kills for that? Seems rather strange you pick 9k kills, and no other ones like, more than 2008 kills? Anyways going by the fact that your wrongfully kill-related amount towards reaching max boxes, to prove that you don't need 9k kills to reach max boxes, contradicts to your wrongfully kill-related pic? As it looks like you don't need 2k kills? Thus in effect makes you a hypocrite? So many questions =/?
