Post from Silence's thread:
When I get the chance, I'll review the above decision further. If there is a hint in bias and inconsistency between this thread's diction and that of Redemption, there is one of two choices -- both threads will be locked or unlocked with a subset of rules -- stay out of each other's threads.
After review of the dialogue within this thread, I have determined that the vast majority of spam has occurred due to a Redemption member posting an inflammatory statement coercing a response from a Silence member, initiating remarks that are deemed as rule breaking.
Off to the Redemption thread.
After overview of the Redemption thread, I see no Silence member posting a response that can be deemed similar to the passive-aggressive responses seen here (within the last 5 days). I have a thought, albeit an assumption -- there seems to be some animosity that has been building over the last month between these two guilds; from what I've witnessed, its because Redemption was recently passed in guild-points. With competition, this is only inevitable; however, must we extrapolate this competition to the point of childish bickering? Both guilds are at fault, don't get me wrong, but one guild (Redemption) maintains an active administrator (several) capable of reprimanding Silence, while Silence itself, has no such authority. So, given I am in neither guilds, I will make the objective decision here -- this guild thread will be unlocked.
Now, as for these passive-aggressive comments. Redemption should abstain from commenting within this thread unless the comment is that without ridicule/passive-aggressive intent. Similarly, this rule bods true for Redemption's thread -- Silence, do what you've been doing for the past 5 days and just remove yourself from the thread to prevent further complications.