[NoS]

Not surprised you'd try to pull that one out.

For someone who talks so much about pulling depth and flow, your implementations of them haven't been good.

[zepher2211]

Changed your dimensions, sigs like that remind me of fat people.

[Optimism]

Not surprised you'd try to pull that one out.

For someone who talks so much about pulling depth and flow, your implementations of them haven't been good.

So you agree opinions vary, with regard to aesthetic sense then?

Flow and depth are somewhat objective and remain external of "aesthetic perception"; i.e., your current signature lacks both flow with regard to render flow lines and depth [self-explanatory]. In addition to this, I deem it aesthetically sub-par >.>.

Both depth/flow can be objectively analyzed if one is educated in what to look for. The second, aesthetics, is always personal preference >.>. For example, you could have amazing depth/flow, but I may still consider the signature ugly ;p.

[NoS]

You know what I feel is the problem. You seem too pretentious.

[zomniethe4]

tell me y that is so true

[Optimism]

You know what I feel is the problem. You seem too pretentious.

Opinions vary, I suppose. If someone asks for a CnC, I'll try to analyze it without jumping to the conclusion that its ugly, i.e., looking for benchmark tools to gauge flow/depth. Also, if the focal has been preserved; other techniques to improve the sig (smudging for instance [maybe give some smudge settings for GIMP]), etc. Apologies for my expectations being higher for yourself, given your extensive history in the GFX community. If you find my corrective statements, pretentious, I can only say you've made an assumption of character and that this is not my intention.

[NoS]

Read what you've just said and you'll see why I say so.

I have a history. That's exactly it. History. How often do you see me churning something out now.

[Optimism]

Read what you've just said and you'll see why I say so.

I have a history. That's exactly it. History. How often do you see me churning something out now.

Then give some fairer/more appropriate analysis, and you won't find myself "correcting" you.

You have no one to blame but yourself for my "pretentious nature".

[zomniethe4]

u started it

[NoS]

Have you considered how little of what you've got there lines up with itself?
Colors are all over the spectrum; needlessly so, the background looks like some messy flux, with a spam of mess of C4Ds accounting for your blending. The text isn't 'blended', it's just intrusive.
Looking at this, if you're going to ask me, is like looking at a car that was built from several different cars and then plastered with multicolor decals.

[Optimism]

Have you considered how little of what you've got there lines up with itself?
Colors are all over the spectrum; needlessly so, the background looks like some messy flux, with a spam of mess of C4Ds accounting for your blending. The text isn't 'blended', it's just intrusive.
Looking at this, if you're going to ask me, is like looking at a car that was built from several different cars and then plastered with multicolor decals.

This is what I expect from you.

I knew it'd be a risky tag. I wanted to try it .

[NoS]

wonder who pulled this out

[Optimism]

wonder who pulled this out

Donno but its bad >.>. LQ resources.

[NoS]

Well, it's what you seem to be doing. And nothing was wrong with those resources.

[Allie]

i think miku is secretly homosexual
does anyone else think so too?