Started by zepher2211, July 12, 2012, 06:00:27 PM
Quote from: Allie on July 12, 2012, 06:30:58 PMThey don't exist. That was there on BOTS aswell. Someone can still apply.
Quote from: Allie on July 12, 2012, 06:37:54 PMWhich means what happened today could've been avoided with an application.Thanks for understanding.
Quote from: Zack66775 on July 12, 2012, 06:11:26 PMQuote from: zepher2211 on July 12, 2012, 06:09:54 PMI figured I could speak logic out of gramps, but it was like I was talking to a robot, "It's on the rules so you got banned" That's really not right. That's not account sharing. It is the only way to do something currently. My suggestion. Contact Allie and hope for the best.
Quote from: zepher2211 on July 12, 2012, 06:09:54 PMI figured I could speak logic out of gramps, but it was like I was talking to a robot, "It's on the rules so you got banned"
Quote from: zepher2211 on July 12, 2012, 06:41:31 PMQuote from: Allie on July 12, 2012, 06:37:54 PMWhich means what happened today could've been avoided with an application.Thanks for understanding.No, what you are saying is everyone should have to wait for me to get on to make room in the guild, invite people, etc; when there is another person in a leadership position in my guild who can do it while I'm gone, there are often long stretches where I don't come online personally.
Quote from: zepher2211 on July 12, 2012, 06:15:00 PMI recall a time when the rules were a means to decide whether someone should be banned
Quote from: Zack66775 on July 12, 2012, 06:45:21 PMQuote from: Zack66775 on July 12, 2012, 06:11:26 PMQuote from: zepher2211 on July 12, 2012, 06:09:54 PMI figured I could speak logic out of gramps, but it was like I was talking to a robot, "It's on the rules so you got banned" That's really not right. That's not account sharing. It is the only way to do something currently. My suggestion. Contact Allie and hope for the best.Quote from: zepher2211 on July 12, 2012, 06:41:31 PMQuote from: Allie on July 12, 2012, 06:37:54 PMWhich means what happened today could've been avoided with an application.Thanks for understanding.No, what you are saying is everyone should have to wait for me to get on to make room in the guild, invite people, etc; when there is another person in a leadership position in my guild who can do it while I'm gone, there are often long stretches where I don't come online personally.Wouldn't be a problem if we could actually appoint co-leaders in game.This should have happened very differently. As Zeph Said:Quote from: zepher2211 on July 12, 2012, 06:15:00 PMI recall a time when the rules were a means to decide whether someone should be bannedThis guy is proving he has a head on his shoulders
Quote from: Allie on July 12, 2012, 06:25:14 PMHe is not the leader. You are. By giving him your account, you are account sharing. Instead of breaking rules, he can wait until you're around instead of getting you banned.
Quote from: loewe98 on July 12, 2012, 06:52:06 PMQuote from: Allie on July 12, 2012, 06:25:14 PMHe is not the leader. You are. By giving him your account, you are account sharing. Instead of breaking rules, he can wait until you're around instead of getting you banned.Than you should give co leaders the power to kick /Inv some1 and there woulden't be any problem..