[zepher2211]

What do you think of flaming as?

I'm going with urban dictionary on this one: To engage in an online argument usually involving unfounded personal attacks by one or more parties.

[Optimism]

Define unfounded.

That is a broad definition, there sir.

[zepher2211]

Without concrete proof; under assumption.

[Optimism]

Without concrete proof; under assumption.

If you are speaking directly to the incident is occurring now over in graphics, then you are attempting to censor members beyond what is appropriate. In my thread, where I am paying out gigas for dedicated GFXers, if I believe someone to be "cheating", then I will call them on it and ask them to provide proof.

You're attempting to turn this forum into Nazi Germany. I understand if this concern revolved around 5+ posts of repeating the same thing in addition to derogatory comments; however, this isn't the case. If this were the case, then I could post ripped sigs to GFX for the next 3 months and become the richest player in this game. Sorry brah.

[zepher2211]

No I'm referring to how multiple players said the same thing without any proof attacking one player, and it's happened before AND because somethings not stated directly in the rules no one seems to have the common sense on this forum to make out what a flame is. You called him out without anything to back you up, no reasoning, no reason to do it. If you're as smart as you seem, the least you could do was to provide reasoning behind your statements.

[Optimism]

No I'm referring to how multiple players said the same thing without any proof attacking one player, and it's happened before AND because somethings not stated directly in the rules no one seems to have the common sense on this forum to make out what a flame is. You called him out without anything to back you up, no reasoning, no reason to do it. If you're as smart as you seem, the least you could do was to provide reasoning behind your statements.

My reasoning was the disparity between text detail/placement and the signature itself. Especially, in his first set of signatures where the text was colored, while the signature was black and white. There is plenty of reason and logic to substantiate my claim. Plenty.

[zepher2211]

I suggest you post you're reasoning next time as without it it's a mindless drone of hate that's coming out of your lips, and btw I watched him make the sig so gtfo.

[Optimism]

I suggest you post you're reasoning next time as without it it's a mindless drone of hate that's coming out of your lips, and btw I watched him make the sig so gtfo.

It wasn't hate, merely an astute observation. I'm still waiting for this new signature. Hopefully, you aren't demoted (this is a joke btw, since you take everything so literally, I best tell you) .

[Jeffalo13]

Without concrete proof; under assumption.

You're attempting to turn this forum into Nazi Germany.

QTF.

[Optimism]

Without concrete proof; under assumption.

You're attempting to turn this forum into Nazi Germany.

QTF.

QFT? yu fal.

XD

[Bounty]

Without concrete proof; under assumption.

You're attempting to turn this forum into Nazi Germany.

QTF.

QFT? yu fal.

XD

Quit Talking Faggot.

I think.
-----------------------

[Optimism]

Without concrete proof; under assumption.

You're attempting to turn this forum into Nazi Germany.

QTF.

QFT? yu fal.

XD

Quit Talking Faggot.

I think.
-----------------------

D:

[Bounty]

Without concrete proof; under assumption.

You're attempting to turn this forum into Nazi Germany.

QTF.

QFT? yu fal.

XD

Quit Talking Faggot.

I think.
-----------------------

D:

:O

[zepher2211]

Yeah, didn't really matter since you can't demote me anymore anyway, Allie said it gave you the power to demote her and SAnta so she took it. /Whatracesaidshesaidonaconvoinmsn

[Jeffalo13]

Without concrete proof; under assumption.

You're attempting to turn this forum into Nazi Germany.

QTF.

QFT? yu fal.

XD

Quit Talking Faggot.

I think.
-----------------------

QFT!