Quote from: Cooky on November 15, 2015, 04:16:16 PM
I do blame humanity. But I also put a lot of blame on religion because that is the motive behind all of these attacks. You can't deny it. But I'm not trying to just hate on religion. That is not how I meant to come across. But rather point out how silly it is to go to religion for help after a terrorist attack motivated by religion just happened. Its times like these where religion really sucks. And to pray about it just seems silly to me. its like shooting some rounds at the firing range in honor of school shooting victims. I think you all misinterpreted what I said as a whole and you're all focusing on one line. Dont pray for paris. Donate. Thats how you can help.

Well yeah, I don't give a damn about how silly you think praying is, so no need for me to comment on that. I meant to focus on just one line. I've already stated what I think about that line no need to do that again.

Quote from: Cooky on November 15, 2015, 03:32:17 PM
I'm a strong believer that the actions of a few does not define an entire religion. Its pretty much common sense. If muslim terrorists bomb Paris it doesn't mean all muslim are terrorists. But just cause not everybody who believes in that religion does end up committing terrorists attacks doesn't mean the few who made this attack didn't do it for religious motives. They shouted allahu akbar as they committed the attacks. Thats Islamic for 'god is the greatest'.  So yeah while it sounds nice to sit there and say it was only a few bad eggs and religion isn't to blame -  just a few using religious motives to do bad things is still worth blaming religion for in the same way people blame guns for the times when someone shoots up a school. You can disagree, thats fine. Its certainly a controversial issue. But to call my argument 'unfair' is just plain ignorant.

Blaming a religion is the stupidest thing I've heard in my whole life. Guns using as an example even more, those things are made by humans think about what you are saying. That's like giving the fault to your couch for having pain in your back. You choose yourself to sit in a way that makes your back hurt (Just using a example). All they do is using religion as an excuse to justify there own actions. The mind of these "creatures" are not the same as you and I. You think that if religion didn't exist these things wouldn't happen anymore? If you do then you are the ignorant one.

I don't understand why you have to blame it at something when the fault is at humanity itself.


R.I.P. My thoughts go out to the family & friends of lost ones.

This is a list of items with prices.

http://boutcheetah.zylongaming.com/index.php?topic=58115.0

Quote from: Mario666 on November 04, 2015, 01:19:54 PM

Quote from: z0co2 on November 04, 2015, 12:53:47 PM
I can understand your point of view and I do agree, It's a solid fact that fewer members would result in more guilds and more competition. That's why I  suggested 15 people instead of 20. Guilds with 10 people are just to few in my opinion, this would only result in players making second guilds to expand which has already happened to several guilds inclusive the one I'm in now with 20 members.

I think you missed my initial point.

Take a guild of 20 people, and we'll call it [Example]. If after a guild wipe there can only be 15 people per guild, [Example] could be remade, but that will leave 5 people from the old guild who must now create a different guild with 5 completely new people. 5 people being left over is worse than if after a guild wipe, [Example] could split perfectly into [Example1] and [Example2].

I see where you are coming from and I would agree with you if there where at least 3 guilds with 10+ active members, but that isn't the case nearly all guilds are inactive/dead with the exception of Silence. I know that most guilds if not all have at least 5 inactive players for a long period of time so they wouldn't feel bad about losing 5 inactive players that are still in the guild just for the amount of GP they have. There might even be 10 inactive, so making 10 players the maximum wouldn't disturb those guilds, but with 15 members you can have new faces in the guild and this way Silence can stay together a guild I really like I'm pretty sure they have 10+ active players.

Quote from: Mario666 on November 04, 2015, 12:40:57 PM

Quote from: z0co2 on November 04, 2015, 11:28:10 AM
I'm only concerned about the max 10 players, I can imagine that guild members that already exist want to stick together when forming a new guild but with 10 members max you're forcing some to join other guilds and compete to former guild members. I would say 15 members is better.

Having the max players/guild number decrease at all would result in currently full guilds to have to exclude certain people.

I don't see it as a problem. The positives that more guilds would do for the game outweighs the negatives that the people in the top guilds now would feel with having to split. At least in my opinion.

I can understand your point of view and I do agree, It's a solid fact that fewer members would result in more guilds and more competition. That's why I  suggested 15 people instead of 20. Guilds with 10 people are just to few in my opinion, this would only result in players making second guilds to expand wich has already happened to several guilds inclusive the one I'm in now with 20 members.

Can't think of any reason why a guild wipe shouldn't' t be done.
Guilds are dead the top 10 guilds are extremely inactive.
Silence is the most active guild at the moment and that's cool and all but what's the point if there are no other guilds to compete with.

New members only want to join top guilds because of the rank they got eventually when they get in and notice that the guild is quite inactive and they become inactive themselves and stop grinding because they don't see the point in grinding anymore.
So yes a guild wipe should be a positive thing for the game and players.

I'm only concerned about the max 10 players, I can imagine that guild members that already exist want to stick together when forming a new guild but with 10 members max you're forcing some to join other guilds and compete to former guild members. I would say 15 members is better.

37

I'll help you gladly. I can see that Roy will too so thats a familiar player I've played alot of rt3 with.
Problem is I'm kinda busy these days, but I'll be online from time to time just message me ingame for help. 

38

63 56 89

Looks fantastic, wouldnt mind if it replaces the current one.

SS Spikenor

I have a P ef only for you just message me on forums or in game.

Damn thats a good price to sell it for, tell me if u need another one. 

Sad to hear that you're quitting. Maybe I'll bump in to u on LOL wich I've been considering to play for some time now.
Cya -eXe-