BoutCheetah

Other => GFX => Topic started by: qwerasdf2453 on January 24, 2012, 08:41:07 PM

Title: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: qwerasdf2453 on January 24, 2012, 08:41:07 PM
ok so can the host enter the sotw? like hawk?
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: Ike86 on January 24, 2012, 08:47:15 PM
You god dam tard. I'm never talking to you on Skype again. Stole my question.

The sensible thing to do is PM one of the hosts (such as Hawk or antisickness). They usually have an idea of what it going down.
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: qwerasdf2453 on January 24, 2012, 09:49:09 PM
Quote from: Ike86 on January 24, 2012, 08:47:15 PM
You god dam tard. I'm never talking to you on Skype again. Stole my question.

The sensible thing to do is PM one of the hosts (such as Hawk or antisickness). They usually have an idea of what it going down.

lol i said ima make a topic about it to you... should have listen instead of ignore
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: Pokeh on January 24, 2012, 09:49:33 PM
Quote from: Ike86 on January 24, 2012, 08:47:15 PM
You god dam tard. I'm never talking to you on Skype again. Stole my question.

The sensible thing to do is PM one of the hosts (such as Hawk or antisickness). They usually have an idea of what it going down.

one of the new 3 mods for sure
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: iwasbobo on January 24, 2012, 09:56:42 PM
I don't see why not? o_O

If you disagree with it, give me an argument.
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: Nucleaon on January 24, 2012, 10:27:22 PM
It's funny because SOTW on BC was my idea. o_o
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: Yz on January 24, 2012, 10:30:17 PM
Quote from: Nucleaon on January 24, 2012, 10:27:22 PM
It's funny because SOTW on BC was my idea. o_o

it's funny cuz everyones thought of it like 800 times each
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: Ike86 on January 24, 2012, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: iwasbobo on January 24, 2012, 09:56:42 PM
I don't see why not? o_O

If you disagree with it, give me an argument.
1) We PM Moderator hosting (whoever made the discussion topic).
2) They see our signature.
3) They make better signature.
4) They can rearrange the order of entries. For example, let's say I'm the first one to submit a signature for an sotw. They can make their signature be first in the order.

^
This plays a psychological factor in voting. 25% of people vote the first signature they see.

5) Potential sabotage (mhmmmmm, not that anyone would do it though but who knows. People are dirty in general.)
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: qwerasdf2453 on January 24, 2012, 10:40:45 PM
im interested in the argument 0.0 wonder who will win
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: zomniethe4 on January 24, 2012, 11:04:45 PM
Trial time.
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: antisickness on January 25, 2012, 05:16:31 AM
Quote from: Ike86 on January 24, 2012, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: iwasbobo on January 24, 2012, 09:56:42 PM
I don't see why not? o_O

If you disagree with it, give me an argument.
1) We PM Moderator hosting (whoever made the discussion topic).
2) They see our signature.
3) They make better signature.
4) They can rearrange the order of entries. For example, let's say I'm the first one to submit a signature for an sotw. They can make their signature be first in the order.

^
This plays a psychological factor in voting. 25% of people vote the first signature they see.

5) Potential sabotage (mhmmmmm, not that anyone would do it though but who knows. People are dirty in general.)

1-3) Don't send you signature in on the first day.
4) This is utter rubbish, i'm sorry. It only really works with names or such with no aesthetic value.
5) If there is any sabotage, such as another person asking you to vote for them, you should contact all hosts (mo, hawk, bobo, and myself) immediately through PM.

Everyone else, stop going off topic.  :)
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: Ike86 on January 25, 2012, 12:15:20 PM
Quote from: antisickness on January 25, 2012, 05:16:31 AM
Quote from: Ike86 on January 24, 2012, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: iwasbobo on January 24, 2012, 09:56:42 PM
I don't see why not? o_O

If you disagree with it, give me an argument.
1) We PM Moderator hosting (whoever made the discussion topic).
2) They see our signature.
3) They make better signature.
4) They can rearrange the order of entries. For example, let's say I'm the first one to submit a signature for an sotw. They can make their signature be first in the order.

^
This plays a psychological factor in voting. 25% of people vote the first signature they see.

5) Potential sabotage (mhmmmmm, not that anyone would do it though but who knows. People are dirty in general.)

1-3) Don't send your signature in on the first day.
4) This is utter rubbish, i'm sorry. It only really works with names or such with no aesthetic value.
5) If there is any sabotage, such as another person asking you to vote for them, you should contact all hosts (mo, hawk, bobo, and myself) immediately through PM.

Everyone else, stop going off topic.  :)
1-3) I'm busy the rest of the week and only have Sunday to work on it and send it in. And plus the host will eventually see your signature. They can simply make edits to their own at the last minute.
4) Order does matter. Would you grab the chocolate bar closer to  you or really far away from you?
5) You can't send a moderator a PM immediately if you aren't available during voting time (e.g. vacation).
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: iwasbobo on January 25, 2012, 12:29:18 PM
Quote from: Ike86 on January 25, 2012, 12:15:20 PM1-3) I'm busy the rest of the week and only have Sunday to work on it and send it in. And plus the host will eventually see your signature. They can simply make edits to their own at the last minute.
4) Order does matter. Would you grab the chocolate bar closer to  you or really far away from you?
5) You can't send a moderator a PM immediately if you aren't available during voting time (e.g. vacation).

Idk about other hosts, but I try to put the sigs in order of which was made first, generally. Not completely in that way, but close.
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: antisickness on January 25, 2012, 01:24:45 PM
Quote from: Ike86 on January 25, 2012, 12:15:20 PM
Quote from: antisickness on January 25, 2012, 05:16:31 AM
Quote from: Ike86 on January 24, 2012, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: iwasbobo on January 24, 2012, 09:56:42 PM
I don't see why not? o_O

If you disagree with it, give me an argument.
1) We PM Moderator hosting (whoever made the discussion topic).
2) They see our signature.
3) They make better signature.
4) They can rearrange the order of entries. For example, let's say I'm the first one to submit a signature for an sotw. They can make their signature be first in the order.

^
This plays a psychological factor in voting. 25% of people vote the first signature they see.

5) Potential sabotage (mhmmmmm, not that anyone would do it though but who knows. People are dirty in general.)

1-3) Don't send your signature in on the first day.
4) This is utter rubbish, i'm sorry. It only really works with names or such with no aesthetic value.
5) If there is any sabotage, such as another person asking you to vote for them, you should contact all hosts (mo, hawk, bobo, and myself) immediately through PM.

Everyone else, stop going off topic.  :)
1-3) I'm busy the rest of the week and only have Sunday to work on it and send it in. And plus the host will eventually see your signature. They can simply make edits to their own at the last minute.
4) Order does matter. Would you grab the chocolate bar closer to  you or really far away from you?
5) You can't send a moderator a PM immediately if you aren't available during voting time (e.g. vacation).
1) Not my problem, I don't work off your sigs anyways.
4) what if that bar was digusting? What if the one on the end was your favourite? Just like sotw, if the end is your favourite, you pick it.
5) Surely you can spare 1 minute to pm "x is cheating". Besides, vacation will have internet.
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: Jeffalo13 on January 25, 2012, 05:32:58 PM
Quote from: zomniethe4 on January 24, 2012, 11:04:45 PM
Trial time.

Kevin!
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: Nucleaon on January 26, 2012, 12:03:12 AM
Wow I misread the question. I thought he was asking to host the SOTW. >_>
Title: Re: SOTW QUESTION
Post by: mo9 on January 26, 2012, 07:16:06 PM
if one host tries anything in his faver there are 3 others to put him in his place ...
and bobo and myself usually don't participate

anyway if u dont trust our hosts dont join our sotws

@nuc
totally true ....