BoutCheetah

What if the guild ranking system was made so that you actually had to be good to be in top..

An overall W/L or +/- for pvp and base mode over some stupid 1/2 xp = gp bullshit for idiots who grind sector who have no concept on what being good is.

Also making it so that guild points that are achieved through pvp and base can not be obtained with shitty OP mercs and II skills. I mean, this game is pretty much LOL WHO CAN GRIND SEXTOAR TEH MOAST AND BUY TEH MOAST EXPENSIB SHITS AND RUNT HE SAME SHIT OVER AND OVARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR LOL.
Sad thing is that it has potential to actually be fun for everyone, not just no-lives or mods.

Free time should not > Skill.

Also, this 50 person a guild crap.. It's retarded. it reduces competition. 10-15 should be the max with a small population like this one.

I agree entirely with the guild cap.

1. Wrong section failzor
2. -.-" There is no possible good way to give gp to a huge group of grinding guild members then to base it off exp
3. W#hat you're saying is that every guild with 50 members should be forced to give away 30-35 members.

It's basically to late to change the guild thing so the 50 members will stay in effect.  As for earning GP PvP and Base should give it as well, because like he said it's who can grind sector the most which takes away from the other game modes as well.

It's a fail because doing it by the exp of guild members proves their activeness, when you do it by skill in pvp/bvb you end with a guild with the best pvpers being in the top.

EDIT
What I would agree with is if a person who won a round of exp got about 2-3 times gp as their exp.

I agree with the Guild Member maximum.. It's not fun anymore in guilds when everyone joins the top guilds and there are only about 3-5 competitive guilds it just ruins the function of even having Guilds.

$5 this is you Fate..

With 50 people in a guild there is no competition.

I completely agree with you.

So guildies should be torn from guilds cause you don't think it's fair?

agree 100% via the guild cap

limiting the numbers would encourage longevity, activity and participation

.......... however it's too late for that

Quote.......... however it's too late for that

So quit with the useless posts about it, does anyone realize this same suggestion has come up multiple times? Use the ****ing search button.

I would rather that EVERY single guild is killed and we start over with a 15-20 people guild cap.

Quote from: 123bomb123 on March 21, 2011, 12:20:52 AM
I would rather that EVERY single guild is killed and we start over with a 15-20 people guild cap.

Ridiculous idea, it's like saying "kill bc's whole history"

Quote from: zepher2211 on March 21, 2011, 12:20:40 AM

Quote.......... however it's too late for that

So quit with the useless posts about it, does anyone realize this same suggestion has come up multiple times? Use the ****ing search button.

It's just something to keep in mind if somehow BC is forced to start over for some reason.. however unlikely that is

The guild member cap would have to be lowered slightly multiple times, maybe by like 5 per month for it to work. 10-15 seems a little unnecessary though, 30 should suffice. Tbh, I don't really care.

A bit too late for a cap on guild member numbers. There is simply too much of a vested interest in the top guilds. A good idea nonetheless jewbie jew :).

Suggestions like this piss me off :3

and that's why it's a suggestion. Innovation can only be a positive thing

No sir, innovation is a two sided sword that destroys things in the process of creating new ones.

No, they're more sided with inventions. The process or concept of innovation revolves around improving on things which are already there, rather than destroying things current.

Leader of Silence is QQing. Shocker.

10-15 guild member is good.

Muncay is bad.

someone is bad because his guild is eventually going to be splitted in little parts and he's gonna lose his rights to brag about #1.

agree tho :)

No.. He's just plain bad.. I pushed him on a level 90 ram and he cried.. He's bad.
No offense, #1 in this game just means.. No life.. That's the whole point.. Any idiot can grind the same crap for hours on end to get points.. A win vs. loss ratio means skill.

+1 for the level cap idea, however -1 that pvp should give gp, ppl would just farm it...

Quote from: Cornhl on March 23, 2011, 07:19:17 AM
No.. He's just plain bad.. I pushed him on a level 90 ram and he cried.. He's bad.
No offense, #1 in this game just means.. No life.. That's the whole point.. Any idiot can grind the same crap for hours on end to get points.. A win vs. loss ratio means skill.

Good god I hate noobs like you, I've never been pushed by a level 90 ram; so your lying. A win v Lose ratio doesn't show skill stupid douche, you can get a lose through a dc and the same perosn will get a win, and it's more easily farmed then sector. It isn't QQing when I'm telling you your idea is shit and I give my reasons. This doesn't just apply to Silence, every guild that has members that love being in that guild would be troubled by this, if you'll notice over half the people that actually agreed to your guild cap suggestion don't play or are in an inactive guild.

Gtfo ya ****ing ****

I just like the idea cause I like smaller groups, I'm neither inactive nor is the guild I'm in inactive.

Quote from: NeoKiller on March 23, 2011, 06:28:44 PM
I just like the idea cause I like smaller groups, I'm neither inactive nor is the guild I'm in inactive.

Quoteover half

Quote from: Racenata on March 23, 2011, 06:29:46 PM

Quote from: NeoKiller on March 23, 2011, 06:28:44 PM
I just like the idea cause I like smaller groups, I'm neither inactive nor is the guild I'm in inactive.

Quoteover half

How would you know, you're not even it, and to add sth to my previous argument, lower level cap means more guilds means more competition means more fun.

Quote from: NeoKiller on March 23, 2011, 06:31:39 PM

Quote from: Racenata on March 23, 2011, 06:29:46 PM

Quote from: NeoKiller on March 23, 2011, 06:28:44 PM
I just like the idea cause I like smaller groups, I'm neither inactive nor is the guild I'm in inactive.

Quoteover half

How would you know, you're not even it, and to add sth to my previous argument, lower level cap means more guilds means more competition means more fun.

The hell are you talking about? And your an idiot, as over half of your guild wouldn't be active at all if they couldn't leach, meaning that's the ideology for most members IE active guilds would not proceed to form.