[Cornhl]

What if the guild ranking system was made so that you actually had to be good to be in top..

An overall W/L or +/- for pvp and base mode over some stupid 1/2 xp = gp bullshit for idiots who grind sector who have no concept on what being good is.

Also making it so that guild points that are achieved through pvp and base can not be obtained with shitty OP mercs and II skills. I mean, this game is pretty much LOL WHO CAN GRIND SEXTOAR TEH MOAST AND BUY TEH MOAST EXPENSIB SHITS AND RUNT HE SAME SHIT OVER AND OVARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR LOL.
Sad thing is that it has potential to actually be fun for everyone, not just no-lives or mods.

Free time should not > Skill.

Also, this 50 person a guild crap.. It's retarded. it reduces competition. 10-15 should be the max with a small population like this one.

[Optimism]

I agree entirely with the guild cap.

[zepher2211]

1. Wrong section failzor
2. -.-" There is no possible good way to give gp to a huge group of grinding guild members then to base it off exp
3. W#hat you're saying is that every guild with 50 members should be forced to give away 30-35 members.

[Shadow]

It's basically to late to change the guild thing so the 50 members will stay in effect.  As for earning GP PvP and Base should give it as well, because like he said it's who can grind sector the most which takes away from the other game modes as well.

[zepher2211]

It's a fail because doing it by the exp of guild members proves their activeness, when you do it by skill in pvp/bvb you end with a guild with the best pvpers being in the top.

EDIT
What I would agree with is if a person who won a round of exp got about 2-3 times gp as their exp.

[123bomb123]

I agree with the Guild Member maximum.. It's not fun anymore in guilds when everyone joins the top guilds and there are only about 3-5 competitive guilds it just ruins the function of even having Guilds.

$5 this is you Fate..

[zomniethe4]

With 50 people in a guild there is no competition.

I completely agree with you.

[zepher2211]

So guildies should be torn from guilds cause you don't think it's fair?

[thugzy]

agree 100% via the guild cap

limiting the numbers would encourage longevity, activity and participation

.......... however it's too late for that

[zepher2211]

.......... however it's too late for that

So quit with the useless posts about it, does anyone realize this same suggestion has come up multiple times? Use the ****ing search button.

[123bomb123]

I would rather that EVERY single guild is killed and we start over with a 15-20 people guild cap.

[zepher2211]

I would rather that EVERY single guild is killed and we start over with a 15-20 people guild cap.

Ridiculous idea, it's like saying "kill bc's whole history"

[thugzy]

.......... however it's too late for that

So quit with the useless posts about it, does anyone realize this same suggestion has come up multiple times? Use the ****ing search button.

It's just something to keep in mind if somehow BC is forced to start over for some reason.. however unlikely that is

[GavinGill]

The guild member cap would have to be lowered slightly multiple times, maybe by like 5 per month for it to work. 10-15 seems a little unnecessary though, 30 should suffice. Tbh, I don't really care.

[Optimism]

A bit too late for a cap on guild member numbers. There is simply too much of a vested interest in the top guilds. A good idea nonetheless jewbie jew .