Quote from: holo on November 13, 2018, 06:55:02 PM
u bought it for me dumbass and never took it off its your lost. Give me items back if your going to quit

yeah give him all your stuff

Sup grod long time no see

What a bunch of nerds cool cats 

Quote from: Allie on March 12, 2016, 02:29:50 PM
April 20, 2006 for bots.

Quote from: Allie on March 12, 2016, 02:29:50 PM
April 20

Sent you one. Check your Zylon Inventory.

Osiris
213 and 127

My opinion is that we don't need Twitter hashtags and 1000s of pictures to show sympathy when something horrible has happened.

I feel like, as sad as it is, things like that just feed peoples wish to be trendy, and let people take advantage of an opportunity to publicly display themselves as kind and sympathetic. They say the people affected "are in their hearts and prayers" when they really only end up in their tweets, statuses, and Instagram posts, only to be forgotten about a week later.

I posted the quote of "cringe" in response to "plasmodium posting a thread on Pray for Paris," not to what happened in Paris.

Quote from: KillerPig on November 14, 2015, 09:13:12 PM
cringe

Any estimation on when the guild wipe will be happening?

Quote from: z0co2 on November 04, 2015, 12:53:47 PM
I can understand your point of view and I do agree, It's a solid fact that fewer members would result in more guilds and more competition. That's why I  suggested 15 people instead of 20. Guilds with 10 people are just to few in my opinion, this would only result in players making second guilds to expand wich has already happened to several guilds inclusive the one I'm in now with 20 members.

I think you missed my initial point.

Take a guild of 20 people, and we'll call it [Example]. If after a guild wipe there can only be 15 people per guild, [Example] could be remade, but that will leave 5 people from the old guild who must now create a different guild with 5 completely new people. 5 people being left over is worse than if after a guild wipe, [Example] could split perfectly into [Example1] and [Example2].

Quote from: z0co2 on November 04, 2015, 11:28:10 AM
I'm only concerned about the max 10 players, I can imagine that guild members that already exist want to stick together when forming a new guild but with 10 members max you're forcing some to join other guilds and compete to former guild members. I would say 15 members is better.

Having the max players/guild number decrease at all would result in currently full guilds to have to exclude certain people.

I don't see it as a problem. The positives that more guilds would do for the game outweighs the negatives that the people in the top guilds now would feel with having to split. At least in my opinion.

I voted yes, and here's my thoughts on it:

It definitely seems like a good way to get people back on and playing, but to be completely honest, it seems like a bit of a cheap way to go about motivating people to become active again. With that being said, I don't personally have too many ideas of what else could be done or added, and considering the current limitations of what the administration can and cannot do, I see a guild wipe as a pretty good option.

Birthdays are dumb.

49

57