[Rossbach]

Ross is warned for spamming, and it is not against the rules.

9. Please note that spamming is NOT on this list; it is only frowned upon (spam bots are disallowed [refer to rule 7]).

[Allie]

Thus why you were warned, and not muted, sir.

[Rossbach]

Thus why you were warned, and not muted, sir.

Why would you warn me for not breaking a rule, mam?


Also, why did you not respond to msn. Rawr.

[KillerPig]

Apparently, Ross can't spell apparently.

Jkjk, if you spammed anywhere that isn't in the spam section then yes, you should get a warning.

[Yoshi91]

huhah nubcake
P.S. I don't really know what this mean even after checking with urban dict.

[Rossbach]

Apparently, Ross can't spell apparently.

Jkjk, if you spammed anywhere that isn't in the spam section then yes, you should get a warning.

So I forgot to press p twice.


/not a rule = no warning

[Allie]

You quoted something for four pages.
I warned you because that's obviously not supposed to be done.
You deserve a warning for it.

[KillerPig]

huhah nubcake
P.S. I don't really know what this mean even after checking with urban dict.

I trademarked that term.

Ontopic: We have a spam section for a reason.

[Rossbach]

You quoted something for four pages.
I warned you because that's obviously not supposed to be done.
You deserve a warning for it.

-.- Still not in rules. Wai no reply on MSN?

[Rossbach]

Oh and btw:

Warning (0): The disciplined user will be given a verbal warning.
Warning [1]: The disciplined user will be marked with a green dot within that player's avatar.
Warning [2]: The disciplined user will be moderated (a MOD/GM must approve of the player's post before it appears within the community forum).
Warning [3]: The disciplined user will no longer be able to post within the BoutCheetah Forum. However, that player will still be able to view the forum.
Warning [4]: The disciplined user will receive a permanent ban.


Where was Ross' verbal warning before the green dot?

[Yoshi91]

I saw a page, the last time I was here than, checked again, and all were gone.
I guess you could be warned, regarding to Rule #7:

7. If you can't think before you post, don't post at all.

Four pages=dkaienfkapek

[Rossbach]

I saw a page, the last time I was here than, checked again, and all were gone.
I guess you could be warned, regarding to Rule #7:

7. If you can't think before you post, don't post at all.

Four pages=dkaienfkapek

Thing is, I was thinking when I was spamming. I was thinking I would love to see Allie's response.

[Yoshi91]

@GreenDot: I don't even see you, someone fix the image, cause it never shows itself.
I agree on the verbal warning, but I disagree on the thinking part.
After four pages(if that info is correct), your flow of thoughts are not uhh...flowing very well.
It's just, "must.quote.reply.repeat."

[Rossbach]

@GreenDot: I don't even see you, someone fix the image, cause it never shows itself.
I agree on the verbal warning, but I disagree on the thinking part.
After four pages(if that info is correct), your flow of thoughts are not uhh...flowing very well.
It's just, "must.quote.reply.repeat."

I was thinking the whole time. My flow of thoughts won't be that low like I'm some kind of baka. Are you saying I can't think at all, even after that short time? /if your implying that my thought process cant even be going as far as thinking then you broke a rule. You don't know what I was thinking so don't go talking like you know.

[Yoshi91]

I never said you weren't thinking. All human beings have to think if they are in the state of consciousness. I'm just saying that your train of thoughts were not very organized after spaming for 1 page+. I'm implying that you can't think to your fullest, not think at all like an idiot when spaming those pages.