[Selene]

Dam bro. Never knew I would say that.

[Allie]

Aight, dis one is sexy.

this one.
it is good.
nice flow, minimal amount but a noticeable amount nonetheless of blending.
grats, you're now a beginner GFXer instead of some retard who opened gimp.

[KillerPig]

Aight, dis one is sexy.

this one.
it is good.
nice flow, minimal amount but a noticeable amount nonetheless of blending.
grats, you're now a beginner GFXer instead of some retard who opened gimp.

**** YES.

[Yoshi91]

i would say; lighten the bg a bit, make your avy eye-catching

cause atm, my eyes just goes over the blur.

With blending, imo, it should be so your render and bg belongs to each other, and they don't contrast so much, but also, you would want a focus point, (the render) to stand out from the bg.

[mhj]

Add a text and it will be complete.

[Allie]

amg god damnit.
text ruins art.
keep the text the fak out of it and it will be complete.

[mhj]

amg god damnit.
text ruins art.
keep the text the fak out of it and it will be complete.

Text doesn't ruin art.

[hawk5005]

amg god damnit.
text ruins art.
keep the text the fak out of it and it will be complete.

Text doesn't ruin art.

....yeaaa it kinda does....
Unless the whole art is made around the text ( no render, just text with effects ).

[Allie]

lets take your sig for example.



Great sig huh, it shows a dragon walking on some sort of path or branch or something.
The dragon has obvious depth and the sig is overall well done.
But what's this?
Some random text out of nowhere that creates more attention than the render.
?!?!?!?!?!

[mhj]

lets take your sig for example.



Great sig huh, it shows a dragon walking on some sort of path or branch or something.
The dragon has obvious depth and the sig is overall well done.
But what's this?
Some random text out of nowhere that creates more attention than the render.
?!?!?!?!?!

You like my sig?! That means so much to me! Thanks Allie.

[Allie]

lets take your sig for example.



Great sig huh, it shows a dragon walking on some sort of path or branch or something.
The dragon has obvious depth and the sig is overall well done.
But what's this?
Some random text out of nowhere that creates more attention than the render.
?!?!?!?!?!

You like my sig?! That means so much to me! Thanks Allie.

its good but the text ruins it.
It grabs more attention than the dragon.
Remove it and it'd be good; learning how to add text is great, but I wouldn't suggest adding them to your sigs at all.

[mhj]

lets take your sig for example.



Great sig huh, it shows a dragon walking on some sort of path or branch or something.
The dragon has obvious depth and the sig is overall well done.
But what's this?
Some random text out of nowhere that creates more attention than the render.
?!?!?!?!?!

You like my sig?! That means so much to me! Thanks Allie.

its good but the text ruins it.
It grabs more attention than the dragon.
Remove it and it'd be good; learning how to add text is great, but I wouldn't suggest adding them to your sigs at all.

Uhm. I will do that. I don't think I merged the text.

[Allie]

A small hint I'll leave as an ending to this off topicness..
Contrast is important, normally the part of the sig with the most contrast gets the most attention.
Nonetheless, if you just make it pop out of the sig, it'll have no blending, thus suck.
A sig like yours has depth but no blending nor contrast; I like the sig as a whole, but the depth is the only element that was really used.

[Meta]

You like my sig?! That means so much to me! Thanks Allie.

i personally hate ur sig, it looks too over sharpened and its just.. ew to me

[kev453]

Text only works if you know how to use it. 'Nuff said.