[Yz]

Siding with Iri, I used both, started with gimp way back when.

[Experiences]

okay, since i started with gimp now i might aswell keep using it :3

[spiderstar]

okay, since i started with gimp now i might aswell keep using it :3

Well I started with Photoshop and then when I went to Gimp it was just weird getting used to the placement of everything.
PS = More user friendly imo for basic things but there's a ton of advanced techniques as well.

[Iridion]

i found the latest gimp version kinda worse tho, they changed some controls and they aren't as direct as before imo
but maybe it's just me being used to the old layout

[Yz]

i found the latest gimp version kinda worse tho, they changed some controls and they aren't as direct as before imo
but maybe it's just me being used to the old layout

Nah, it really did downgrade.

[leroy0690]

Never did use GIMP, but I know that a program that is free will never be as good as a highly recommended program as photoshop that you have to pay for(or pirate hehe-haha).

I would skip GIMP and go staight to PS, because I know down the road... you will certainly switch to PS if you ever get serious. I would say cut to the chase TBH.

[Nucleaon]

Everybody has a cracked version of Photoshop.
I use photoshop, always have. When I made a sig with GIMP I was confused as to what the hell was going on. Photoshop came easier to me ;/

[antisickness]

Let me just drop a bomb. Everyone who has gained some reputation through gfx here has done it using PS, not gimp.

[Iridion]

ya the dude tho isnt looking for a beast gfxer reputation but to start making signatures

i dont agree, anyway 

[Yz]

Let me just drop a bomb. Everyone who has gained some reputation through gfx here has done it using PS, not gimp.

You're wrong though. The old GFXers of 2010 were actually as good as the new ones, Hawk & Met not included as they're old & new.

[antisickness]

Let me just drop a bomb. Everyone who has gained some reputation through gfx here has done it using PS, not gimp.

You're wrong though. The old GFXers of 2010 were actually as good as the new ones, Hawk & Met not included as they're old & new.

compare those to the gfxers of today. (angrod, materger and heck even leroy)

[Iridion]

lol just remembered hawk's c4d spams

[Yz]

Let me just drop a bomb. Everyone who has gained some reputation through gfx here has done it using PS, not gimp.

You're wrong though. The old GFXers of 2010 were actually as good as the new ones, Hawk & Met not included as they're old & new.

compare those to the gfxers of today. (angrod, materger and heck even leroy)

wtf? i just said they were as good as the new ones, meaning they do compare. srsly wtf how did you notread my whole post. lol

[antisickness]

I know...? Dude I'm saying actually compare them. I haven't a clue who you're talking about.

[Yz]

I know...? Dude I'm saying actually compare them. I haven't a clue who you're talking about.

i did, in my head l0l

and i haven't noticed a big change.there were people like izy and davy back then, but that's not rly the point is it? the point is that people here have used gimp and done sigs as good as ones done on PS.