January 22, 2021, 11:11:05 PMLatest Member: SusanKnono
BoutCheetah » Forum » Other BoutCheetah Stuff » Suggestions » Base Update - requires input from players

Base Update - requires input from players

Started by Santa, December 25, 2013, 02:46:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Xkiller712

Quote from: Selene on September 22, 2014, 06:21:21 PM
No point in wasting time with hardly any players.
thats not a good way to go about the game. what about revival.  i know some people that would play more if bvb was fun


ghostkid17

Quote from: Selene on September 22, 2014, 06:21:21 PM
No point in wasting time with hardly any players.
I disagree, with improved content the game could bring back some of the older players and even more new ones.
-Oreos-
Quote from: Materger
I am now an Oreos fan!
Quote from: Allie
Oreos was a failed project.





Cooky

Quote from: ghostkid17 on September 22, 2014, 06:29:00 PM
Quote from: Selene on September 22, 2014, 06:21:21 PM
No point in wasting time with hardly any players.
I disagree, with improved content the game could bring back some of the older players and even more new ones.

Thornz

Quote from: Cooky on September 22, 2014, 06:30:37 PM
Quote from: ghostkid17 on September 22, 2014, 06:29:00 PM
Quote from: Selene on September 22, 2014, 06:21:21 PM
No point in wasting time with hardly any players.
I disagree, with improved content the game could bring back some of the older players and even more new ones.
Such as myself...

IGN: FM Thornz [Lv 270]
Quote from: cyc0828He destroy my guild
Not pants

-Speedy-


#1 *Sector Nub*
-Speedy-, Speedy II, Speedy III




Meteor

Quote from: Selene on September 22, 2014, 06:21:21 PM
No point in wasting time with hardly any players.
Dat positive attitude.
So you're basically saying that due to the fact that there aren't many active players we shouldn't update the game at all and let it die?

ok

(click to show/hide)

qolderman

Quote from: Meteor on September 23, 2014, 04:25:09 AM
Quote from: Selene on September 22, 2014, 06:21:21 PM
No point in wasting time with hardly any players.
Dat positive attitude.
So you're basically saying that due to the fact that there aren't many active players we shouldn't update the game at all and let it die?

ok
Quote from: ghostkid17 on September 22, 2014, 06:29:00 PM
Quote from: Selene on September 22, 2014, 06:21:21 PM
No point in wasting time with hardly any players.
I disagree, with improved content the game could bring back some of the older players and even more new ones.
this 2
IGN: Caustic



^thanks cooky <3
Quote from: Cooky on August 03, 2014, 12:05:07 AM
whats wrong with eating a sock

LightRequiem

September 26, 2014, 12:42:39 AM #82 Last Edit: September 26, 2014, 12:47:48 AM by LightRequiem
Quote from: Selene on September 22, 2014, 06:21:21 PM
No point in wasting time with hardly any players.
Actually, this is true. Base would never get an update, especially when you consider how slowly sector updates are being made. Obviously base needs an update, but it's never going to get one. Base is not a profitable mode, largely because of how BC was designed. If BC had gone a different direction, base could've been profitable. However, ultimately, it's not really the admins' fault for lack of updates to base mode; it's the community's collectively. The community wanted (and maybe still wants... idk because I don't regularly check anymore) updates that just kept on making their stats better, and the admins ultimately just gave the players what they wanted. So, if you "really want to fix/update base," you're going to have to take a completely different mentality towards the game, which is realistically not going to happen.

So, regardless of what you guys claim you want, base is not going to get an update, and it will probably remain dead for the rest of BC's lifespan.

These are just my 2 cents from just being around this community forever, but I honestly think that what I said holds a lot of truth. That being said, I don't consider myself part of this community anymore.

okay bai cyas

triblion

Quote from: Reviax on December 25, 2013, 04:37:33 PM
Quote from: Epic xD on December 25, 2013, 04:04:35 PMI updated my list.
Silver just reminded me that the new Reaper flag should be on the OP list as well.

Correct me if i am wrong but last time I was playing and that wasnt that long ago all of these items that have been named here are already banned on the OP list are they not? And in base I think that you should make it more fair for all bot types because Surge (Good at pvp) Ram (No speciality) Patch (Base and Sector tanks)


(Yes I know that rams are used in sector but they are not as useful as patches are as they deal a hell of a lot more damage and they have special damage 0 so untransed they will not damage them)


Sorry for the english grammar and spelling its early here.


-SS Trib

Bubbabear

Quote from: triblion on December 28, 2014, 09:10:46 AM
Quote from: Reviax on December 25, 2013, 04:37:33 PM
Quote from: Epic xD on December 25, 2013, 04:04:35 PMI updated my list.
Silver just reminded me that the new Reaper flag should be on the OP list as well.

Correct me if i am wrong but last time I was playing and that wasnt that long ago all of these items that have been named here are already banned on the OP list are they not? And in base I think that you should make it more fair for all bot types because Surge (Good at pvp) Ram (No speciality) Patch (Base and Sector tanks)


(Yes I know that rams are used in sector but they are not as useful as patches are as they deal a hell of a lot more damage and they have special damage 0 so untransed they will not damage them)


Sorry for the english grammar and spelling its early here.


-SS Trib

Your quoting posts from 2013, considering it's now end of 2014. But yeah it's only unblanced because of the new sets and items. It was more balanced before, just needs nerfing and a re-balance but they got loads of things to sort out first.
"Time Heals Almost Everything, Give The Time, Some Time"
IGN: LordBubba / Bubbabear ^^
Member Since: August 08, 2011


Quote"I see now that the circumstances of one's birth are irrelevant. It is what you do with the gift of life that determines who you are."

Xkiller712

What about a base mode where it's *set up*.  There's one set to use for surge, one set for ram, and one set for patch that way it's automatic no op and people cant complain.


LightRequiem

January 07, 2015, 01:53:34 AM #86 Last Edit: January 07, 2015, 01:57:38 AM by LightRequiem
Quote from: triblion on December 28, 2014, 09:10:46 AM
Correct me if i am wrong but last time I was playing and that wasnt that long ago all of these items that have been named here are already banned on the OP list are they not? And in base I think that you should make it more fair for all bot types because Surge (Good at pvp) Ram (No speciality) Patch (Base and Sector tanks)


(Yes I know that rams are used in sector but they are not as useful as patches are as they deal a hell of a lot more damage and they have special damage 0 so untransed they will not damage them)


Sorry for the english grammar and spelling its early here.


-SS Trib
Your stereotypes of the bots is wrong. In this game, with the rules agreed upon by experienced basers, surges are the best overall. This is largely due to surges being able to stack too much TG at this point. We got most of the really unfair stuff banned (+4 Omni/Discus, DH, II skills, raid armor, etc.). At this point, the only things that need to be changed to balance bots types is to change the stats E.F.s and minibots give. Neither E.F.s nor minibots should give TG. They should give HP, Crit, or SP. As such, +4 E.F.s and minibots should give only HP, Crit, and SP. Removing TG from these would reduce surges' TG and give rams their niche back. Regardless, +4 E.F.s and minibots should be added to the no OP items tag to increase build diversity. Having access to all 3 of HP, crit, and SP kills diversity in builds and removes personal preference in customizing your bot...

To put things in perspective, surges can get roughly between 1800-1900 TG, which is insane. Surges should have roughly 1400-1500 at most. Having an extended TG like this gives surges too much power with killing mercs. They are already great at killing things out of trans, so they shouldn't have a really long trans that gives them even better merc killing abilities, too.

Edit:
Actually, SP needs to be modified to make rams more viable. The two T-Bot special transformations really screw rams over. SP can potentially be a huge boon for rams if it were reverted to its older format of just having Kowbat, Bugbear, Blaster, Mandragora, and Melissa.

MasterMerc

#stopmegatron2k15

LightRequiem

Quote from: MasterMerc on January 07, 2015, 01:59:18 AM
nice rolls
If you didn't know, this is a joke among basers for ram special trans. Basically, you hope that you get a good special trans (a "good roll").

Generally, "nice rolls" is used sarcastically because you rarely get the special trans you want. :<

Corr

Never have I heard anyone say "nice roll" in BvB. lmao.

ZeaL - Rank 1 Hax, just because
I do it for the lulz.

Copyright © ZylonGaming 2009 - 2021
-Terms of Use-