[paranoia]

Its a good/bad Idea. I like the concept but unless we can find a way where we can have a fair trade system so players won't get scammed it wont be smart to have this. For example: I am selling my account and take someones money who buys it for $50 and I take the money then don't give them my account.

Both mine and Misterz's posts don't have this problem. Money would be going to ZG in both of our scenarios so the account must be going through ZG.

Its a good/bad Idea. I like the concept but unless we can find a way where we can have a fair trade system so players won't get scammed it wont be smart to have this. For example: I am selling my account and take someones money who buys it for $50 and I take the money then don't give them my account.

before getting money, you sell it to ZG. where the account will be locked until ZG finds a buyer. There's no way to scam unless someone files a dispute or something with pay pal.

That's why it's suggested with two steps instead of one (ZG taking a portion) because it could work but in the perfect situation that nobody is a douche.

If  they use this Idea I think they should use purple's idea. But what if someone hacks another person account just to sell it?

[Purple]

Its a good/bad Idea. I like the concept but unless we can find a way where we can have a fair trade system so players won't get scammed it wont be smart to have this. For example: I am selling my account and take someones money who buys it for $50 and I take the money then don't give them my account.

Both mine and Misterz's posts don't have this problem. Money would be going to ZG in both of our scenarios so the account must be going through ZG.

Its a good/bad Idea. I like the concept but unless we can find a way where we can have a fair trade system so players won't get scammed it wont be smart to have this. For example: I am selling my account and take someones money who buys it for $50 and I take the money then don't give them my account.

before getting money, you sell it to ZG. where the account will be locked until ZG finds a buyer. There's no way to scam unless someone files a dispute or something with pay pal.

That's why it's suggested with two steps instead of one (ZG taking a portion) because it could work but in the perfect situation that nobody is a douche.

If we they use this Idea I think they should use purple's idea. But what if someone hacks another person account just to sell it?

That's one of the reasons why ZG being involved in selling/buying accounts would be a bad idea.

Could do something like each time a foreign ip is connected to the account the account holder has to wait 30 days to sell it, but inactive accounts could still get hacked & sold.

[paranoia]

Its a good/bad Idea. I like the concept but unless we can find a way where we can have a fair trade system so players won't get scammed it wont be smart to have this. For example: I am selling my account and take someones money who buys it for $50 and I take the money then don't give them my account.

Both mine and Misterz's posts don't have this problem. Money would be going to ZG in both of our scenarios so the account must be going through ZG.

Its a good/bad Idea. I like the concept but unless we can find a way where we can have a fair trade system so players won't get scammed it wont be smart to have this. For example: I am selling my account and take someones money who buys it for $50 and I take the money then don't give them my account.

before getting money, you sell it to ZG. where the account will be locked until ZG finds a buyer. There's no way to scam unless someone files a dispute or something with pay pal.

That's why it's suggested with two steps instead of one (ZG taking a portion) because it could work but in the perfect situation that nobody is a douche.

If we they use this Idea I think they should use purple's idea. But what if someone hacks another person account just to sell it?

That's one of the reasons why ZG being involved in selling/buying accounts would be a bad idea.

Could do something like each time a foreign ip is connected to the account the account holder has to wait 30 days to sell it, but inactive accounts could still get hacked & sold.

I really dont know how this is going to work, let me do some research.

[Reviax]

I don't understand. Why would ZG want to buy an account for their own game? Can't they just make an account and give it a bunch of crap then sell it to someone?

[Allie]

You haven't checked out our ToS.

1.3. Subject to your acceptance of these Terms of Use, Company grants to you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable limited license to use and display the Service and related software (excluding source and object code) for your personal non-commercial use. You agree not to use the Service for any other purpose, or to copy or distribute the content of the Service except as specifically allowed in these Terms of Use.

If we ever wanted to do this (which we wouldn't), we reserve the right to revoke ownership from any account in our database, and sell it to another player if we so wish.

[123bomb123]

I don't understand. Why would ZG want to buy an account for their own game? Can't they just make an account and give it a bunch of crap then sell it to someone?

more items in the game

[qolderman]

+1

[Purple]

+1

I don't see a point in  +1ing the suggestion when Allie already said that they wouldn't be doing this.

[cascaval123]

+1
gz Z for idea

[Toast]

You haven't checked out our ToS.

1.3. Subject to your acceptance of these Terms of Use, Company grants to you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable limited license to use and display the Service and related software (excluding source and object code) for your personal non-commercial use. You agree not to use the Service for any other purpose, or to copy or distribute the content of the Service except as specifically allowed in these Terms of Use.

If we ever wanted to do this (which we wouldn't), we reserve the right to revoke ownership from any account in our database, and sell it to another player if we so wish.

for the +1'ers

[Iridion]

You haven't checked out our ToS.

1.3. Subject to your acceptance of these Terms of Use, Company grants to you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable limited license to use and display the Service and related software (excluding source and object code) for your personal non-commercial use. You agree not to use the Service for any other purpose, or to copy or distribute the content of the Service except as specifically allowed in these Terms of Use.

If we ever wanted to do this (which we wouldn't), we reserve the right to revoke ownership from any account in our database, and sell it to another player if we so wish.

for the +1'ers

aka postcounters

[Reviax]

I don't understand. Why would ZG want to buy an account for their own game? Can't they just make an account and give it a bunch of crap then sell it to someone?

more items in the game

What would be so bad about having more items in the game though?

[Purple]

I don't understand. Why would ZG want to buy an account for their own game? Can't they just make an account and give it a bunch of crap then sell it to someone?

more items in the game

What would be so bad about having more items in the game though?

It messes with the economy of the game.

[-PeaceLover-]

ill be a middleman if the admins ever change their minds.

[Reviax]

What would be so bad about having more items in the game though?

It messes with the economy of the game.

How? New items are generated every time somebody buys ZC anyways. Isn't it the same thing?